Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit se7en's column >>

SE7EN

Home Page
Articles Posted: 0  Links Seeded: 514
Member Since: 1/2006  Last Seen: 2/20/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Why are energy saving CFL bulbs failing in American homes?

Seeded on Tue May 1, 2007 4:20 AM EDT
Read ArticleArticle Source: The Washington Post
us-news, environment, energy, conservation, cfl, flourescent-bulb
Seeded by se7en
Advertise | AdChoices

The current market share of CFL bulbs in the United States is about 6 percent, up from less than 1 percent before 2001. But that compares dismally with CFL adoption rates in other wealthy countries such as Japan (80 percent), Germany (50 percent) and the United Kingdom (20 percent). Australia has announced a phaseout of incandescent bulbs by 2009, and the Canadian province of Ontario decided last week to ban them by 2012.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

  • se7en's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: rationalists, Worldviews
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (49)
se7en

This is a shame. CFL bulbs may cost more, but they also last a lot longer. It's time to play catchup.

  • 7 votes
Reply#1 - Tue May 1, 2007 4:26 AM EDT
Only Known SurvivorDeleted
steveoutdoorrec

I manage a wilderness park that gets all of it's power from solar panels. The only bulbs we use are CFL. No noticeable difference in light from incandescent.

But at home I have problems with some fixtures and the size just as jamesjones does.
Hopefully the manufacturers are working on smaller bulbs

  • 1 vote
Reply#3 - Tue May 1, 2007 7:51 AM EDT
Cary Quinn

You should be able to find adapters, or smaller bulbs at the larger hardware chains.

A friend of mine was able to find replacement CFL bulbs for his chandelier lights, and they even work (to some extent) with a dimmer switch.

  • 1 vote
#3.1 - Wed May 2, 2007 1:11 AM EDT
Division by Zero

You can definitely find a better selection at major hardware stores versus the major discount stores. All sizes, wattages, and adapters are readily available at Lowe's or Home Depot.

Right now I'm debating replacing my few remaining incandescents before they actually burn out, figuring that the electricity savings will be more than the cost of the discarded bulbs. Our homebuilder installed all incandescents but I'm fully stocked on CFL's awaiting each burnout.

  • 1 vote
#3.2 - Wed May 2, 2007 10:05 AM EDT
Reply
ComSen

Some of the problems I've seen are:

It's hard to get powers much above 60 watts incandescent equivalent.

Alot aren't dimmable.

Those that can be dimmed, have a minimal level where they then flicker off, probably at 50% intensity.

At least the 2 dimmables I've played with, when you first turn it on, they are significantly dim (50%?) at first and then brighten after a minute or two.

  • 7 votes
Reply#4 - Tue May 1, 2007 8:30 AM EDT
miasma

Mark your calendars. I agree with what ComSen said.

Having said that, I have replaced about 3/4's of my incandescents with CFLs. One other thing I would add to the detractors is that they tend to take a little while to get to max brightness (warm up). What I have done in my bathrooms where I have multi-bulb fixtures, I am putting in 2 CFLs & 2 standard bulbs. Also CFLs can sometimes cause noise in my studio (RF interference). But I have been able to get around this. That is the one place I have them on a dimmer, but I never used it to dim anyway so It matters not to me.

  • 2 votes
#4.1 - Tue May 1, 2007 1:21 PM EDT
phrozen

i guess guys....such an inconvenience to worry about your own children. im glad your taking the time to switch but in 50 years when the lights go completely out...you'll be wishing you had switched everything over. CFL's are such a pain in the ass i guess...so next time you look at your kid or young relative...look them right in the eye and tell them the air they breath will never be as clean as the air you are breathing right now.

  • 1 vote
#4.2 - Tue May 1, 2007 2:19 PM EDT
finalcut

phrozen: What are you talking about? They are replacing their lightbulbs. They may not have adopted 100% but they, at least, are doing it on some of their lamps.

Your whole rant is both misplaced and ill conceived. Find an appropriate target for your venom.

  • 6 votes
#4.3 - Tue May 1, 2007 2:27 PM EDT
bulboramaDeleted
finalcut

bulborama.com eh? You must be loving a thread like this were you can legitimately shill your wares!

good luck.

  • 1 vote
#4.5 - Tue May 1, 2007 9:31 PM EDT
miasma

look them right in the eye and tell them the air they breath will never be as clean as the air you are breathing right now.

Thanks finalcut, I had stopped monitoring this thread. Phrozen, whenever anyone is so adamant I have to do something to save my children, or the children I have to seriously question their motive. You don't know me. You don't know what all I have done to cut down on energy usage. And I am not going to defend myself. Don't get your angel-wings all bent.

  • 1 vote
#4.6 - Mon May 7, 2007 10:26 AM EDT
Reply
Division by Zero

I've been using CFL's for about 3 years now in 2 different homes, initially in fixtures that were too inconvenient to change regularly then gradually throughout the house. I did run into a few problems with size but switched to different designs or lower wattages to fix that. At first my wife and I weren't happy with the delay and flicker upon flipping the switch but we know to expect it now. The energy savings has been noticeable but the greatest benefit has been not having to pull out the ladder (vaulted ceilings) every few months to change a bulb.

  • 9 votes
Reply#5 - Tue May 1, 2007 9:23 AM EDT
iarnuocon

Some other problems:

Power ramp-up. Many of the CFL bulbs that I've used are "instant on", but to reach maximum light output sometimes takes several minutes. When first turned on, the bulb is significantly dimmer at startup than after it has been on a while.

Color. CFL bulbs in general put off a greenish light that is absolutely dreadful. In some applications, I just don't care. But, for instance, in my living room (which is painted a rich red, with a ragged-on glaze of brown over top) CFL bulbs make the paint job look hideous.

Expense. I know that CFLs are supposed to last much longer than incandescents, but like all bulbs, there are always the ones that are bad out of the box. They last just long enough for you to get comfortable, and then stop working. I've had CFLs that quit working within a week of buying them. When I pay $.50 for an incandescent, that's not a problem. When I pay $6 for a CFL, that's a problem.

Lampshades. Can the CFL manufacturers please make a CFL that a clip-on lampshade will hook up to? The vast majority of CFLs appear to be either vastly larger than incandescents when "bulb" shaped, or simply those spiral types that no clip-on lampshade will ever hook up to.

External lighting. Says right on the package: "not for outdoor use".

The truth is, if they weren't so damn expensive, LED lights would be the way to go. They last 60 times longer than incandescents, and they use 1/10 the energy. Screw CFLs. Buy LEDs.

  • 11 votes
Reply#6 - Tue May 1, 2007 9:25 AM EDT
ComSen

Regarding color, if you know what color temperature is close to incandescent (2600?), you can get a CFL that is close to that. One problem though is not all bulbs have that listed. Some say full spectrum or other non-descript words.

  • 8 votes
#6.1 - Tue May 1, 2007 9:36 AM EDT
KyleN

I thought LED too but they are too directional for general use room lighting. They make little spots of light but even with diffusers aren't anywhere near the light output of CFL/incandescent in large applications.

So I'm putting in CFL where they fit, slowly replacing fixtures where they don't fit and using LEDs for reading lamps or gooseneck lamps on our desks.

  • 2 votes
#6.2 - Tue May 1, 2007 11:17 AM EDT
Reply
ChrisRonk

Here are some other problems I've heard about about the CFL bulbs. It's worth a read.

As each CFL contains five milligrams of mercury, at the Maine "safety" standard of 300 nanograms per cubic meter, it would take 16,667 cubic meters of soil to "safely" contain all the mercury in a single CFL. While CFL vendors and environmentalists tout the energy cost savings of CFLs, they conveniently omit the personal and societal costs of CFL disposal.

Read the full article here

  • 8 votes
Reply#7 - Tue May 1, 2007 9:34 AM EDT
Eco-geek

I read that same article yesterday, and as a result did some research of my own.

While each CFL bulb does contain a significant amount of mercury, that becomes less of an issue if the bulbs are disposed of properly, and not just sent to the landfill with the rest of your trash. Unfortunately, it looks like proper disposal is at the very least a pain to find a place, and could also cost you a fee (at least, it does at any of the disposal places near me, from the research I've done).

Still, even if you send the bulb to the landfill, the difference in energy consumed between a CFL bulb and a standard incandescent bulb results in greater mercury released to the atmosphere from the extra coal that is burned in order to power the incandescent bulb. This is less true in countries that get less of their power from coal, but here in the US, it's definitely true.

There's also the issues with the color of the light. Personally, I greatly prefer the warmer tones of incandescent bulbs, but that may be a difference I need to just learn to deal with.

Finally, there is the issue with switching fluorescent lights on and off. I'm not sure how or even if this applies to CFLs, but if you're only going to have a light on for a brief amount of time, CFLs may be less economical than incandescent bulbs due to the increased energy required to energize such a bulb, but moreso due to the increased wear from turning such bulbs on and off.

Like many things, this issue isn't as cut and dry as we're led to believe.

  • 8 votes
#7.1 - Tue May 1, 2007 10:03 AM EDT
ChrisRonk

I doubt seriously that a large percentage of these will be disposed of properly. We are putting a lot of faith in individuals.

  • 3 votes
#7.2 - Tue May 1, 2007 10:28 AM EDT
Jay Butler

Finally, there is the issue with switching fluorescent lights on and off. I'm not sure how or even if this applies to CFLs, but if you're only going to have a light on for a brief amount of time, CFLs may be less economical than incandescent bulbs due to the increased energy required to energize such a bulb, but moreso due to the increased wear from turning such bulbs on and off.

I do not believe that this startup usage is as big an issue as many believe. I recall seeing some television show that tested standard fluorescent tube startup versus incandescent. The result was that the the startup energy consumption was not significantly greater than the running consumption. It might have been 50% greater in the first second or two, but it is not worth leaving a light on to avoid that nominal usage.

  • 3 votes
#7.3 - Tue May 1, 2007 10:41 AM EDT
Jay Butler

I doubt seriously that a large percentage of these will be disposed of properly. We are putting a lot of faith in individuals.

That is probably true. I have no idea how I would do that where I live. If it is any more difficult than putting out the weekly recyclables, most folks will probably not do it (even if they knew how).

I did a little digging and found this site that helps.
Earth 911
It gives disposal and recycling information by zip code.

  • 2 votes
#7.4 - Tue May 1, 2007 11:00 AM EDT
Eco-geek

The energy usage isn't as big of an issue, but it's more that turning fluorescents on and off tends to cause greater wear on them, thereby decreasing the life. As life plays directly into this mercury issue, as well as cost, it's pertinent, I think.

That Earth 911 site you link is the one I went to yesterday to find disposal/recycling information. Unfortunately, the only place in my city that doesn't charge a fee for disposing of CFLs is about 30 miles away, on the opposite side of town. GRR!

  • 1 vote
#7.5 - Tue May 1, 2007 11:16 AM EDT
2cats

I read the same article you mentioned. In doing some research on the web, it seems that all flourescent bulbs contain mercury, a toxic substance. If they are manufactured to pass the TCLP test, they are not considered hazardous waste material if broken and may be disposed of in regular trash. If they fail the test, they are considered hazardous waste when broken and according to federal (and most state) regulations must be disposed of at a facility that can handle it. Another thing, is the rules are different if you use the bulbs in a business, or in a household. Under federal law, households are exempt from the hazardous waste rule. I don't understand why the same bulb would be hazardous if a business uses it, but not if you use it at home. see http://www.almr.org/support_files/stringency3.html

    #7.6 - Wed May 2, 2007 1:22 AM EDT
    Jay Butler

    I don't understand why the same bulb would be hazardous if a business uses it, but not if you use it at home.

    Probably volume. Businesses will generally have more fixtures and will run those fixtures more hours per day than the average home. Therefore, they will create far more potentially hazardous waste in the form of these bulbs.

    • 1 vote
    #7.7 - Wed May 2, 2007 11:54 AM EDT
    Reply
    Chum

    I'm in the process of switching all of mine over. The lamps are definitely the biggest challenge. So far though, I love it. Fortunately, my partner and I don't really care about the downsides, which are minimal. NOT so happy to hear about the mercury issue. Guess I'd better do some more research...

    • 6 votes
    Reply#8 - Tue May 1, 2007 10:23 AM EDT
    glen1n1m

    So how many people have worked with crunchy-creative type people who refused to have the flourescent lights on in their office? I heard things like "The 60hz flickering is bad for your health" or "I dont believe in flourescents, incadescent is more natural". Where are these people now?

    • 5 votes
    Reply#9 - Tue May 1, 2007 11:30 AM EDT
    dwchin

    I wouldn't call myself crunchy-creative, but fluorescent light gives me a headache and makes my eyes more tired than non-fluorescent light sources. Most office environments I've worked in have been horrible for that reason. I therefore prefer not to put fluorescent lighting in my home. I haven't tried CFL bulbs yet, but it'll be interesting to see if it's a better alternative to fluorescent lighting.

    • 1 vote
    #9.1 - Tue May 1, 2007 5:22 PM EDT
    Cary Quinn

    The problem is not fluorescent lights, it is bad ballasts.

    Older fluorescents were built around a standard frequency that allowed for a noticeable flicker (and hum) from the electronic ballasts used to manage the bulbs. Which could become a persistent annoyance to people sensitive to that flicker.

    (Good quality) CFLs (and newer long fluorescent fixtures) are built with higher frequency ballast circuitry, where the flicker and hum of switching power back and forth to produce the light, should be well outside the range of human perception, and easier to deal with on that score. The color range may still be different than natural light or incandescent bulbs though, so it sometimes helps to see the lights on display before purchasing a set, if you can.

    • 1 vote
    #9.2 - Wed May 2, 2007 1:24 AM EDT
    urbane gorilla

    ah, Cary, that might explain why CFLs don't bother me, but the lighting in most commercial buildings does. and, yeah, i'm a crunchy/creative head case.

    • 1 vote
    #9.3 - Wed May 2, 2007 2:25 AM EDT
    Reply
    Cash

    A small minority will buy bad technology to feel good but it's a placeo. Soon enough we'll have organic solar-powered LEDs. Problem solved. In the meantime, the poles will not melt because you refuse to buy crappy lightbulbs that annoy the bejeesus out of you.

    • 2 votes
    Reply#10 - Tue May 1, 2007 12:09 PM EDT
    FDBryant3

    Personally I like CFL's because they save money and I don't have to change bulbs as often. That is good enough for me. That said LED's are probably the lighted way of the future.......just waiting for them to be viable.

    • 3 votes
    #10.1 - Tue May 1, 2007 2:44 PM EDT
    Gwenny

    Hear, hear! I'm usually on the front end of the curve to try new things. So I invested in these bulbs and I am not happy. The light is very . . . unsatisfying. It says 100 watts but it's so dim. And they don't fit well into any of my fixtures so I have naked bulbs in many places. Add to that they are, in fact, dangerous if broken, and I'm regretting I jumped to get on this bandwagon.

    Nice article about the LEDs. There are already a variety of bulbs (another link) available, although I think this is the coolest. There's some really cool stuff out there. My only concerned is disposal. Unless we can get wide spread use of TDP. Then it's all good.

    • 2 votes
    #10.2 - Tue May 1, 2007 3:56 PM EDT
    FDBryant3

    I wonder if there is a quality factor to the bulbs. I've been using CFL's for years now and to be honest haven't notice a difference in the quality of the light. When I first started using them I did notice there was a warm up effect, although I don't think I notice it now. Now to be honest I really am not the type of person to notice this sort of thing and I don't have incandescents to compare it to.

    To be honest I think somebody like ConsumerReports should do some testing.

    • 1 vote
    #10.3 - Wed May 2, 2007 8:20 AM EDT
    Reply
    urbane gorilla

    love'm - they last over a year & knocked $10/mo off the electric bill. I have both soft white & daylight versions. normally fluorescent light gives me a headache, but these don't bother me at all, though I do have a high-intensity halogen lamp for reading.

    still , disposal worries me, so I have the expired bulbs in a closet. That, plus the fact that none are American-made, to my knowledge. I suspect this is not only because of the usual cheap labor reasons, but also to circumbent environmental & occupational safety regs.

    all in all, I'm glad I made the switch.

    • 6 votes
    Reply#11 - Tue May 1, 2007 1:08 PM EDT
    Apollo

    I replaced every bulb I have w/ GE's line of CFL bulbs, I used to use GE Reveal and I can not tell the difference at all. I did not like the Phillips CFL line of bulbs though, those were poor bulbs.

    • 5 votes
    Reply#12 - Tue May 1, 2007 1:22 PM EDT
    TomPitysFools

    I used the same bulbs, and had the same experience.

    Some of the concerns expressed in the comments here (manufacturing costs, disposal problems) are legit, but size and color never bothered me. Disposal won't be an issue for awhile, so I'm taking the cross-my-fingers-and-wait approach.

    Startup times are maybe a second slower, but if that alone bothers you enough to not save over 75% on the energy costs, well...

    • 5 votes
    #12.1 - Tue May 1, 2007 4:49 PM EDT
    Reply
    Belarius

    Why are energy saving CFL bulbs failing in American homes?

    Probably for some of the same reasons that we still use bedsheets & blankets (as opposed to comforters) and doorknobs (as opposed to door handles). People value familiarity over efficiency.

    For my part, I can say with some pride that I haven't had to make a bed in years.

    • 3 votes
    Reply#13 - Tue May 1, 2007 1:27 PM EDT
    Kathleen54

    Bela, I have to agree with you about this:

    People value familiarity over efficiency.

    We Americans are, I feel, especially prone to nay-say something which deviates from the norm. We also tend not to like being told by the government what we should do which in some cases is pigheaded of us. The instance of our not using more CFL bulbs than our wealthy, global counterparts is a case in point.

    • 2 votes
    #13.1 - Tue May 1, 2007 3:03 PM EDT
    Reply
    Ed T

    I noticed last weekend that Home Depot had CFLs in bright white, soft white, and daylight. That might be the solution for those applications where the harsher color temperature of early CFLs was offputting.

    • 4 votes
    Reply#14 - Tue May 1, 2007 2:41 PM EDT
    BobTriCities

    I've replaced all my incandescents with CFLs, mostly daylight ones. No problems at all.

    • 3 votes
    Reply#15 - Tue May 1, 2007 3:36 PM EDT
    JoulesBeef

    takes a bit to get used to the color of some of these
    and i have not had any problems finding above 60 watt equiv
    i have replaced all mine a couple years ago
    they do last way way longer
    and save me power and pay themselves off within the year.
    and though kind of minor
    they dont produce as much heat energy that has to be removed by your ac later
    not goin to burn yourself unscrewing a lit CFL, try doing that with a halogen :)

    while i am concerned for the enviroment, i mainly did this for the power savings as my home is very old and it was cheaper to reduce consumption than replace the electrical system.

    • 4 votes
    Reply#16 - Tue May 1, 2007 3:55 PM EDT
    Paradox460

    At costco, i found a pack of cfl bulbes, about the size of a small plum, that emit 100wats of light. They fit everywhere.

    Still, i prefer LED lights, as the ones we have actually let you adjust the white balance by a knob on the back (screwdriver required)

    • 6 votes
    Reply#17 - Tue May 1, 2007 5:51 PM EDT
    bulboramaDeleted
    Enlightenment

    I have been using CFL's since they were first introduced for outdoor. I have 2 on all night, every night, thus my electric saving is considerable. If you have a porch and your light is far enough from the roof line, then you can use internal CFL's because water can't touch them. I've used indoor CFL's as my porch light and it didn't have a problem during the winter at my house, which I don't think has got below a few degrees below F during the coldest night. I always buy the more expensive outdoor CFL's for my other light because it is exposed to the rain.

    Ways to get around the weird color of CFL's:
    - Buy the more expensive natural light CFL's.
    - Mix bulbs. If you have have seperate switch per light, or have a bank of lights controlled by one switch, you can mix cheap bulbs with more expensive ones to get better lighting. I have one of those floor-based light trees in my computer room, and have a cheapest 40W CFL that I can find, a 100W CFL different temperature, a 60W Full Spectrum Natural Light Neodymium bulb. I can turn on any combination as needed. In my kitchen, I have two cheap flourescent tubes (save money) plus 1 expensive daylight flourescent tube which all turn on at the same time. The 1 daylight tube makes a big difference in the lighting and a good cost balance.

    • 5 votes
    Reply#19 - Tue May 1, 2007 6:42 PM EDT
    oatmealsnap

    Some people have been saying they can't get CFL's to fit in their lights. I get the smaller, wound bulbs that are actually smaller than incandescent bulbs. Just thought I would let it be known.

    • 3 votes
    Reply#20 - Tue May 1, 2007 9:24 PM EDT
    kikaiju

    We're at almost 100% CFL now and the energy savings from that allows us to basically run the air conditioning for free. Or leave the A/C off and just enjoy the savings.

    Disposal of used bulbs is a concern. There are options in my area, not convenient but they do exist. Right now, we're happy to keep used CFLs in a box while we wait for close-by local recycling to catch up. It's not a big deal.

    • 3 votes
    Reply#21 - Tue May 1, 2007 11:50 PM EDT
    cjp

    Anyone who is interested in buying CFL bulbs should take a look at www.lightsofamerica.com. These are the ONLY CFL bulb made in USA. All others are made in China. What a shame that is. They cost the same as the ones at Home Depot, Lowes, etc., but they support our economy. Anyone who thinks this is unimportant should check out www.boycottmadeinchina.org and form your own opinion. I buy nothing made in China, light bulbs included.

    • 2 votes
    Reply#22 - Tue Jun 19, 2007 7:31 PM EDT
    Spacegoat

    I buy nothing made in China, light bulbs included.

    That must be pretty hard to do. I can pick any 20 random objects around me and find the Made in China stamp, including this keyboard on which I am typing. Thanks for the tip though.

    • 1 vote
    #22.1 - Tue Jun 19, 2007 10:49 PM EDT
    Reply
    Sny734

    I called Lights of America in the summer of 2007. After being handed off a few times I finally talked to a person of position in the company. He told me they no longer make CFLs in the USA. I assume like any other corporate company. Greed.
    I would like to know how any state or gov agency can enact a law that forces me to buy imported products. I think the law should be challenged.

    • 1 vote
    Reply#23 - Tue Apr 8, 2008 1:22 PM EDT
    BSW4

    I switched our home to CFLs two years ago -- with good results in terms of energy consumption, longevity and color. Bought the bulbs from Lights of America because they were the only U.S. manufacturer. Now Lights of America imports from China. Gutless. All told, an American-made incandescent is a better citizen than a Chinese-made CFL, so we're going back to incandescents when our CFLs die.

      Reply#24 - Sat Aug 9, 2008 7:27 PM EDT
      RMFL

      I, too, was happy to find a US-Made source of CFL bulbs.  Turns out that even though Lights of America's home page proudly proclaims its products are Made in USA, this is no longer true.  The company from which I ordered (online) provided the following information:

      "The Lights of America bulbs you ordered are made in China. We do stock fluorescent bulbs made in USA.
      The following items are made in the USA:
      2425----$8.80 each
      2420---$7.80  each
      2415---$6.80  each
      2320---$7.80  each
       
      If you have any questions feel free to contact us.
       
      Thank You
      Energy Saving Products

      800-377-4545"

      There's a reason why most are made in China.  It's because the Chinese are oblivious to the pollution and environmental concerns.  I would rather pay more for the bulbs knowing they are being manufactured with some effort at preserving the environment.  There is only one earth and it matters not where the pollution is taking place.  At some point, we all have to live with it.

      • 1 vote
      Reply#25 - Tue Dec 9, 2008 1:01 PM EST
      dijeda

      If the bulbs were made in America, I would replace all mine with them. But I'm not going to toss out my American made lights for ones made in China. And anyone who makes a law saying we MUST do that is nuts. Why do we keep making ourselves dependent on China??? We should be doing everything we can to buy our own products, not let someone else tell us we HAVE to buy from other countries!

      And the bulbs I have tried in the past did NOT last longer than my regular bulbs. In fact after buying 4 of them and have them burn out within a couple of months, I gave up and bought my regular kind again. (This was before I realized that they were made in China and not USA)

        Reply#26 - Tue Nov 2, 2010 9:50 PM EDT
        Leave a Comment:
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
        (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
        Newsvine Privacy Statement
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
        FUN STUFF:
        • Leaderboard |
        • E-Mail Alerts |
        • Top of the Vine |
        • Newsvine Live |
        • Newsvine Archives |
        • The Greenhouse |
        COMPANY STUFF:
        • Code of Honor |
        • Company Info |
        • Contact Us |
        • Jobs |
        • User Agreement |
        • Privacy Policy |
        • About our ads
        LEGAL STUFF:
        • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
        • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
        • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com