'Lipstick' has become a political buzzword, thanks to a joke by GOP vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin. But a comment about Palin and the cosmetic has now landed Barack Obama in hot water.
- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (3087)
- NBC Nightly News (0)
The neocons can dish it out, but they can't take it!
- 14 votes
Correct. No matter how anyone wanted to run their campaigns, the gloves are now off and mudslinging has always been the norm in politics.
If McCain wanted to run a 'clean' campaign (is there such a thing?), got 'hit' by the opposition and came back swinging, his supporters would not say "What a hypocrite..."; they would say, "Well, the other side started it, so he has a right...!"
Political reality; deal with it.
- 8 votes
Biggest seller at the republican convention must have been pacifiers. With the elephant emblem on them
- 11 votes
Maybe you're right, that's why all we hear lately is Obama's big mouth costing him vote, after vote, after vote. By the time this election is over, he will wish he had shoved a big fat donkey pacifier in his own mouth. You know, sometimes less is more - *experienced* senators have learned that. That's why rookie of the year will still be a senator in 09'.
- 5 votes
No not pacifiers, toilet paper with Obama's face on it, I bought one and used it before I left because I didn't want to scare kids with that picture.
- 3 votes
Logdump,
I can't believe I'm typing this, but I like the idea darnit. It fits these folks perfectly. They want to play hardball politics all day every day. Yet, one supposed barb slung in their direction and they whine and complain until the cows come home. Pacifiers with elephant emblems should be passed out at every Obama rally between now and election day. Anyone out there capable of mass producing these for us? :-)
Pacifiers with elephant emblems should be passed out at every Obama rally between now and election day
Yes! So that when Obama sticks his foot in his mouth for the millionth time, it will cue everyone to insert their custom made Republican pacifiers - a perfect symbol that only McCain can pacify their needs! You are a genius! I will make them personally...
Thanks!
- 2 votes
Talk about pigs, I, too, remember when MacMean said that a little girl was ugly. When he said that, I felt like someone had stabbed me in the heart because Chelsea was a little girl, and girls are inherently conscious of this nation's facist views on beauty. When this monster called a little girl, Chelsea, ugly, I thought this was as low any man could stoop, only at that time, I did not realize it was MacCruel who said this about Chelsea, a little child!
Guys, I wonder how McCruel feels now, that he is infinitely much uglier than the young woman Chelsea is today. McCruel also said mean things about Janet Reno's looks too. I wonder how this ethical, decent man feels about today, being every bit as attractive to the opposite sex as Janet Reno? This hero, this ethical, decent but exceedingly ugly old man is more akin to a mindless, unethical, cowardly however so absolutely ugly old mean goat/pig.
Help me, out here guys. Are there enough adjectives and descriptive nouns to describe an adult male that attacks a little girl's looks. Uh, uh! Evil old, ugly pig, with or without any lip gloss that covers a man's innate soul. Add mean to the descriptive, ugly ole pig. Only a coward would attack a little girl's looks for any reason.
- 6 votes
Karl Rove has been the leader of the Capaine since Palin got there, and the only thing she keeps saying is how the bridge to no where was her plan to stop it and how Obama is not as good as she is. Than you have the pig with lipstick on and you have to swift boat begins. why can't we talk about the issue like health care and getting the gas to go down and the care of our Veterans when they come home instead of lipstick on a pig.
Obama need to stay on task, no distraction and he will win.
Obama is too wish-washy to win and the majority of americans know that. He doesn't belong in the race, he hasn't earned the right. He has spent most of his senatorial time running for president, he has very questionable associates, denies that he has said anything wrong, when it is on the news the day before, changes his mind to suit who ever he is speaking to. Puts down people in penn, when he is in san francisco and too many other things to mention. He is not to be trusted, and even denies the facts against him.
There is no way I would ever vote for a man like that who wants to raise taxes in a recession. What a moron. He even wants to increase spending of money we don't have. How is that helping the economy? It will destroy the economy and also this country.
- 3 votes
I supported John McCain in 2000. In my opinion, what George W. Bush did to him in the Carolinas was despicable, and made it impossible for me to ever vote for Bush. In my view, the presidential elections are entirely about the characters of the candidates. Times change so policies change, but I believe a person's character, a person's core, is immutable. The facts about John McCain's youth, that he goofed off in school, coming in 5th from the bottom of the 899 cadets in his class, that he got into and through Annapolis through his Admiral father's influence, that he was captured and imprisoned in Viet Nam, that in his old age he says he can't remember how many houses he owns or how much money he has, I take all these with a grain of salt. The young often grow out of their foolishness and perform a brave act, and the old sometimes forget.
I just can't bring myself to vote for someone I now know to be an adulterer.
This year I learned that John McCain met Carol Shepp, a swimsuit model from Philadelphia, in 1964. They married in '65 and had a daughter. While John was imprisoned in Nam, Carol was in an accident that ruptured her spleen, broke her arm and her hip, and crushed both her legs, leaving her six months in the hospital. Two more years and 23 operations left Carol four inches shorter than when she'd first met John. When John was released from Nam, he told friends she was "…not the woman I married." His POW status allowed him to strike up a friendship with the Reagans. While Carol worked in Ronald Reagan's 1976 presidential campaign, John had extramarital affairs. In 1979, a 42 year old John chased a 24 year old beer distributor heiress, Cindy Lou Hensley, around a buffet table set up to honor veterans, and had a relationship. Months later John shocked Carol and the Reagans with his divorce demand. I have yet to hear that the Reagans forgave him.
Now John has admitted his sin and I can forgive, as Jesus would have me do. But then, it's not hard to forgive a man for breaking his solemn promise to someone else. And if he and Carol had agreed to a divorce, releasing each other from their vows, before he started having affairs, I could forget. But John couldn't wait. And now he proposes to share the Oval Office with a former beauty pageant "Miss Congeniality". What I can't do is ever trust a man who breaks the most sacred oath a person ever takes, "…to love and to cherish…in sickness and in health…till death do us part."
I suppose there are those who would see nothing wrong with doing what John did and would find some way to defend it, but I believe that to keep our sacred oaths against the pull of animal instinct is where true courage and true character are found.
How can he ever be trusted to keep any promise he makes about judges or the unborn or anything else, if he can't keep the most sacred one?
Are the republicans so short minded that they can't remember McCains recent Lipstick on a Pig comment when dealing with Hillary. Mudslinging and diverting attention from his lack on substance is the only way he can battle the election. So what is his "secret plan" to catch Bin Laden. And if he really has one why hasn't he given it to the current administration. Put country first and rid the world of Bin Laden. Oh but then he couldn't use it as a campaign tool, much like 911 and Palin.
John McCain and his camp want to discuss "lipstick on Pigs", because they do not have anything else to talk about. They did this 2000, and 2008; to distract us from the issues. Housing, jobs, homeland security, gas prices, future energy policies, the economy.
WAKE UP AMERICA!!! Listen to policies, ask questions of the woman who is a heart beat away from the Presidency. This woman wants to ban books for God sakes. This woman believes God punished the Jews in recent terrorist attacks, because they haven't embarrassed Jesus..... WHO IS THIS WOMAN, AND WHY IS IT TABOO TO CHALLENGE HER ON HER POLICIES? IT IS NOT SEXIST PEOPLE!!
- 1 vote
Obama / Biden 08
The wining team with or with out lipstick No issues for McBush just complaints, hiding behind a skirt, Lipstick on an elephant, now that's classy
Song bird McCain
- 12 votes
BOTH sides need to stop with the smear tactics and get back to speaking up for what they are about individually....I never was bale to figure out just what Kerry stood for because he was too busy talking about the other guy. Must be hear about animals and lipstick...obvious sexist remarks?
- 2 votes
BARACK OBAMA'S GLOBAL POVERTY ACT
The Junior Senator wants to tax the United States of America to the tune of $800 BILLION to help impoverished peoples worldwide? Force a tax on Americans to help 3rd World and African countries?
From the Junior Senator's Own Website:
http://obama.senate.gov/press/080213-obama_hagel_can_1/
What Glen Beck has to say about it! LOL! Too funny!:
- 2 votes
HEAR ABOUT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA'S ECONOMIC STIMULATION STRATEGY?
Raising the Capital Gains Tax?
That means people will be dissuaded from selling stock and property thereby torpedoing the economy.
As well? It DECREASES government tax intake!
Torpedo the Economy and Torpedo Tax Intake?
Great Plan, Junior!
LOL!
Here's Barack showing his ignorance on the entire matter. He looks like a deer in the headlights when caught not knowing what he's talking about:
Despite his Harvard education and 300 advisors? The Junior Senator hasn't figured out that more taxation NEVER leads to a better economy.
- 4 votes
ON THE ECONOMY ...
Barack Hussein or McCain Palin?
It boils down to taxes.
Barack's economic plan is predicated on raising taxes.
Palin's and McCain's plan? To keep them the same or lower them.
If you think raising the taxes of Americans is going to help the economy and make you richer? Vote for Barack Hussein Obama.
If you think lowering taxes of Americans is going to help the economy and make you richer? Vote for McCain/Palin.
You see. It boils down to whether you believe in Trickle DOWN Economics OR Trickle UP Economics (LOL!). But that's what it boils down to.
It's that simple.
Historically. Raising taxes on ANY SEGMENT OF AMERICA? Has NEVER improved the economy. Listen to your intuition on this one. Because it's right. TRICKLE UP ECONOMICS is so absurd it has never existed as an economic strategy - that's why you've never heard of the term. But that's what Barack Hussein, community-organizer extraordinaire's economic strategy is! The Harvard Law graduate? Obviously wasn't paying attention in Econ 101.
- 6 votes
Good morning, Doc. I see you have had your caffeine today. You never had a post that you did not feel better about having several more. ;>)
Time for me to go, my age, blood-preasure and IQ are too high for this.
Have a good day.
- 3 votes
VC22 & Barbara in Houston - I agree with both of you on the Religion factor.
Freedom of Religion in Government is not nearly as important as Freedom FROM Religion in Government. That is where the religious persecution (practiced by the current administration) is coming from. And yes, not all Muslims are radical/fanatical, AS not all Christians are radical/fanatical. I think most all religions are based on loving thy neighbor in this life in hopes of a reward or something in whatever after-life your particular faith is in. Fanaticism is practiced by those who cannot respect and love their neighbors. That is the problem with the far-(self) right (eous).
The right to chose our own faith is being compromised by one issue platforms such as McCain/Palin, but more importantly, our right to choose Health Care, feed our families, work in the United States at jobs that are not being outsourced for tax incentives, travel on vacations with our children, decide to live to take care of our live children rather than die in the course of a complicated pregnancy, are the greatest loses we are going to suffer if we vote against our needs in favor of trying to convert America to "One Nation under One God, Indivisible".
- 2 votes
DrWhoo,
As a Doctor I hope the hell you are not. Your one sided distorted information goes against everything I believe in. If you want to be in any way taken seriously present both sides equally. Pay attention to the news on the economy as it now stands. More people have lost jobs, health insurance, homes, and lives, based on poor judgment. Are both candidates proposing change on our current path? The unemployment rate if you haven't noticed is the highest since 2002. Are the number of new jobs coming in equal to those being lost? Under the Obama plan I probably will pay more in taxes because I make over $250,000 a year. Why don't you tell us how I would be taxed under the McCain plan? Also why don't you tell me how the people losing these jobs are going to pay for their health care? Are we supposed to let them die because they don't have the money? I don't believe there is anyway you can put lipstick on that pig.
- 3 votes
My My It goes against everything you believe in, tis a shame. Although we won't mention that during the clinton years it was higher yet and so were interest rates. Carter had the worst history of anyone when it came to economics and foriegn policy...
- 2 votes
I'd like to ad that Clinton also went to Nixon for advice in foriegn policy...
- 2 votes
Obama has a good head on his shoulders, and will get the people think about the situation we are in and what MCCain will do if he gets in office and what Biden will do if he gets in office and what Palin will do when she gets in office OH WAIT WE ARE NOT ALLOWED TO ASK HER ANY QUESTION OR HEAR HER RESPONDS TO ANYTHING THAT MAY HELP US TO BETTER UNDERSTAND HER POSITION OF THINGS, SO IT'S LIKE BUYING A PIG IN A POKE,
Now that's a bit unnerving wouldn't you say she says the same thing about how she came into office and than take some jabs a Obama and MCCain stand there by her just smiling, that's real sick.
- 1 vote
If Bush has billions for an unecessary war, he can find the money for affordable health care. Where has he been for 8 years. Follow the profits to find the recipients of all that war money, Cheney's buddies. Obama is not raising capital gains tax rates for the lower incomes, only for the over 250K people. Quit spreading more rumors. My vet recently was telling me how hard it was to stay in buisness with the current tax structure which he says will be worse for himself under the Democrats. If he had a factory making a product he would move his company to China. He thought OSHA was a waste of time. I asked him how much his medical benefit premiums were and he didn't provide any to his employees. When I took Barney the Boxer back for his Parvo injection I was curious if I would have to go to China for his injection. Maybe the vet doesn't understand that if things continue the way they are people will not be able to afford pets and he will be in that unemployment line with the rest of us. I had a friend like him once, so easy to wind up. For every dollar spent to ensure employees right to organize, 26 dollars are spent to red tape employees to death to ensure no union is formed. This was the Republican deal which John McCain supported. McCain is no friend of Unions. Palin's husband is not a true union member if he supports these policies.
- 2 votes
DR. Whoo: $800 million in charity to the poor people of the world is better than $3 trillion in bombs and bullets to murder the poor people of the world. As far as I understand it, that is the Bush/MCain policy. I don't know what Palin thinks on that issue. Apparently she has never thought about it or at least never thought of anything worth sharing.
- 2 votes
I supported John McCain in 2000. In my opinion, what George W. Bush did to him in the Carolinas was despicable, and made it impossible for me to ever vote for Bush. In my view, the presidential elections are entirely about the characters of the candidates. Times change so policies change, but I believe a person's character, a person's core, is immutable. The facts about John McCain's youth, that he goofed off in school, coming in 5th from the bottom of the 899 cadets in his class, that he got into and through Annapolis through his Admiral father's influence, that he was captured and imprisoned in Viet Nam, that in his old age he says he can't remember how many houses he owns or how much money he has, I take all these with a grain of salt. The young often grow out of their foolishness and perform a brave act, and the old sometimes forget.
I just can't bring myself to vote for someone I now know to be an adulterer.
This year I learned that John McCain met Carol Shepp, a swimsuit model from Philadelphia, in 1964. They married in '65 and had a daughter. While John was imprisoned in Nam, Carol was in an accident that ruptured her spleen, broke her arm and her hip, and crushed both her legs, leaving her six months in the hospital. Two more years and 23 operations left Carol four inches shorter than when she'd first met John. When John was released from Nam, he told friends she was "…not the woman I married." His POW status allowed him to strike up a friendship with the Reagans. While Carol worked in Ronald Reagan's 1976 presidential campaign, John had extramarital affairs. In 1979, a 42 year old John chased a 24 year old beer distributor heiress, Cindy Lou Hensley, around a buffet table set up to honor veterans, and had a relationship. Months later John shocked Carol and the Reagans with his divorce demand. I have yet to hear that the Reagans forgave him.
Now John has admitted his sin and I can forgive, as Jesus would have me do. But then, it's not hard to forgive a man for breaking his solemn promise to someone else. And if he and Carol had agreed to a divorce, releasing each other from their vows, before he started having affairs, I could forget. But John couldn't wait. And now he proposes to share the Oval Office with a former beauty pageant "Miss Congeniality". What I can't do is ever trust a man who breaks the most sacred oath a person ever takes, "…to love and to cherish…in sickness and in health…till death do us part."
I suppose there are those who would see nothing wrong with doing what John did and would find some way to defend it, but I believe that to keep our sacred oaths against the pull of animal instinct is where true courage and true character are found.
How can he ever be trusted to keep any promise he makes about judges or the unborn or anything else, if he can't keep the most sacred one?
Jewish voters may be wary of Palin
By BEN SMITH | 9/2/08 6:53 PM EST Text Size:
ST. PAUL, Minn. — Barack Obama has struggled for 18 months to lock down the support of a traditionally Democratic group, Jewish voters.
In the past week, John McCain may have helped Obama with his Jewish problem by choosing Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate.
McCain and Obama are battling over a portion of the Jewish community: older, conservative Democrats, largely in South Florida, some of whom backed Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primary. McCain's secular, hawkish credentials appeal to many in that group, who are skeptical of Obama's relatively short record and have been deluged with rumors about his pro-Palestinian leanings.
But Democrats hope Palin's social conservatism, her paper-thin record on Israel, and — perhaps most importantly — her cultural roots in evangelical Christianity may be a major turnoff to Jewish voters, just as Republicans have tried to reach women disappointed that Obama didn't choose Hillary Clinton,
Democrats have already begun to to capitalize on the choice of Palin — over Jewish Connecticut Sen. Joseph Lieberman — in South Florida and elsewhere. A prominent Obama backer, Florida Rep. Robert Wexler, has attacked Palin for appearing at a 1999 event with Pat Buchanan — who has attacked the influence of the Israeli lobby in America. And the same factors that are rallying the evangelical base to Palin may push away the Jews.
"There is almost always an inverse proportion between a candidate's popularity among conservative Christians and secular Jews," said Jeff Ballabon, a Republican lobbyist long active in Jewish politics who supports McCain.
An illustration of that gap came just two weeks ago, when Palin's church, the Wasilla Bible Church, gave its pulpit over to a figure viewed with deep hostility by many Jewish organizations: David Brickner, the executive director of Jews for Jesus.
Palin's pastor, Larry Kroon, introduced Brickner on Aug. 17, according to a transcript of the sermon on the church's website.
"He's a leader of Jews for Jesus, a ministry that is out on the leading edge in a pressing, demanding area of witnessing and evangelism," Kroon said.
Brickner then explained that Jesus and his disciples were themselves Jewish.
"The Jewish community, in particular, has a difficult time understanding this reality," he said.
Brickner's mission has drawn wide criticism from the organized Jewish community, and the Anti-Defamation League accused them in a report of "targeting Jews for conversion with subterfuge and deception."
Brickner also described terrorist attacks on Israelis as God's "judgment of unbelief" of Jews who haven't embraced Christianity.
"Judgment is very real and we see it played out on the pages of the newspapers and on the television. It's very real. When [Brickner's son] was in Jerusalem he was there to witness some of that judgment, some of that conflict, when a Palestinian from East Jerusalem took a bulldozer and went plowing through a score of cars, killing numbers of people. Judgment — you can't miss it."
Palin was in church that day, Kroon said, though he cautioned against attributing Brickner's views to her.
The executive director of the National Jewish Democratic Council, Ira Forman, cited the "cultural distance" between Palin and almost all American Jews.
"She's totally out of step with the American Jewish community," he said. "She is against reproductive freedom – even against abortion in the case of rape and incest. She has said that climate change is not man-made. She has said that she would favor teaching creationism in the schools. These are all way, way, way outside the mainstream."
Huffington Post on Tuesday posted portions of Palin speaking at her former church, a politically conservative Assemblies of God congregation, in which she suggested that an Alaska pipeline plan reflects God's will.
A spokesman for McCain and Palin, Michael Goldfarb, dismissed the notion that Palin would bring a Jewish problem.
"If this is going to be about who was at church on the day of which sermon, that's not going to be an argument that the Obama campaign is going to win," he said, a reference to Obama's controversial former pastor, Jeremiah Wright.
"This woman has been on the national stage for all of four days – of course it's going to take some time for people to get a sense of what her views are on some things," Goldfarb said. "Once she's had a chance to make her positions clear on these issues, the Jewish community is going to be very, very comfortable with her."
In the meantime, however, there's simply little information available about Palin's views. Two of Palin's prominent Alaska Jewish allies, Rabbi Joseph Greenberg and businessman Terry Gorlick, told Politico they consider her a friend of the Jews. But they said they'd never heard her discuss Middle East policy in detail and that she'd never visited Israel, though they cited a boilerplate Alaska-Israel friendship resolution she signed
The Republicans have developed a new style this year: after years of criticizing political correctness, they have developed incredibly thin skins. Palin can call herself a pit bull with lipstick, but Obama gets blasted when he uses a currently popular turn of phrase, "putting lipstick on a pig." I fail to see the difference. McCain referred to Hillary Clinton's healthcare proposals as lipstick on a pig, but no one took offense. Why is Palin different? Perhaps a political candidate needs to have a bit more nerve to run for office. Let's have Palin say she regrets her use of the pit bull image, and McCain regret using his turn of phrase in reference to Hillary, and then maybe Obama should apologize after that. We should all apologize for and retract everything we say. It's ridiculous.
- 23 votes
Political campaigns are always the no-man's-land of double-standards.
"To every-thing, spin...spin...spin; this is the season, spin...spin...spin..."
- 4 votes
David
Saying the Republicans are thin skinned. Oh, C'mon.
Speaking about thin skin, Obama has ratcheted up the victim card, by insinuating he is being attacked by the press in regards to Race. I have yet to see it. He admits this has not come out of the McCain camp. When I have heard race mentioned, it has come from Obama himself on multiple occasions. Comments to the effect. "He does not look like the presidents on the One and Five Dollar bills, "By the way did you notice he is black" I have not heard comments from anyone else. Comments such as this create more racial tension and devisivness. How dare anyone question Obama about Wright, Rezko or Billy Ayers. Just think, if Obama wins the election he can invite Ayers to the White House, a place his weather underground once plotted to bomb.
- 7 votes
Much to do about nothing this is not even worth the paper they wrote it on and the writer needs to be kicked for saying it was an obvious stretch-clearly drawing a connection to Palin's joke.
- 3 votes
Because the religious Reich are nothing but hypocrites,liars and cheats..........................If you had a real pig with lipstick,but put a big old REPUBLICAN sign on it,and mcain told everyone don't worry this pig is a superpig,and she is gonna shake up Washington.doesnt matter that he just picked her up on spur of jealousy at the local slaughter house,Now I have me a rock star super pig and I can stand on her coattails for a cheap ride.Because she is a super pig,she can lie with a smile and pretend she cares.
Who cares about policy,who cares about the economy,who cares about vets even though mcain is one,he doesn't care about vets or he would have signed legislation to help them,No, BUT HE HAS A SUPER PIG with LIPSTICK
- 8 votes
Michelle
I can not debate you on this issue and admit that I stand in your shadow on knowledge of this situation. I can only recall the phrase "it takes one to know one" and bow to your first hand knowledge of this sort of person.
- 3 votes
All you have to do is open your beady little piggy eyes and look in the mirror!
- 1 vote
Michelle and Bluecollarblogger,
According to your posts you are on the same side - Obama's - so stop quarrelling at cross purposes. You are just not understanding each other!! Funny!!
They are not only lying, but hypocritical about the real issues much more about the attacks!
bajangirl
No, I am not on Obama's side, I think he's a worm. I am not on McCain's side either, He is another worm. I am on America's side. I do not see the need for or any thing positive coming from statements like those made by Michelle and others on this forum. I have engaged in some of it, for fun, but it does nothing to resolve the issues that we face as a nation. I will apologize to those I have insulted but I picked on those that I felt had posted these ridiculous comments and left the door open for a response of the same nature. It is, however, a childish and sophomoric sort of thing and does remind me of the sort of nonsense you might expect from a bunch of Jr. High kids.
- 1 vote
hello-again-nincompoop
Why don't you just go to 'YouTube' and stay there. Those movies can be entertaining for people who have trouble amusing themselves. Obviously you don't like people who aren't WHITE enough. I realize that being black is going to cost Obama a few votes, but if we can get enough of you folks to watching them thar movin pictures on YouTube, you all 'ill be to dern busy to vote.
Go Obama!!!!!!!!!!!!
- 1 vote
The Republicans do not have thin skin in fact I bet they are loving these unfounded attacks and smear tactics on Palin. The Polls are showing that the more the Dems attack her the more people want to vote for her. Why do you think the Dems are now trying to calm their party and stop the attacks. Even Hillary knows better to attack Palin. In the end Obama and Biden will lose the election and Hillary will be there to say "I told you so".
- 4 votes
I'm sorry again !
I didn't get the statement right .... was it about someone with lipstick on a pig
or was it about someone with lipstick on a monkey ?
f18, Hillary is probably standing back and laughing at this whole bumbled mess, thinking 4 more years and I'll be off and running.. Obama showed the world that he was in charge all right. Its funny.
- 2 votes
DavidDecon
I agree with you all the way how is it that the Republican Party can just pick something out of the air and then act like they are so surprise at the out come of it.
Obama needs to stick to the issues no matter what and keep pounding home the facts that he knows so well.
I supported John McCain in 2000. In my opinion, what George W. Bush did to him in the Carolinas was despicable, and made it impossible for me to ever vote for Bush. In my view, the presidential elections are entirely about the characters of the candidates. Times change so policies change, but I believe a person's character, a person's core, is immutable. The facts about John McCain's youth, that he goofed off in school, coming in 5th from the bottom of the 899 cadets in his class, that he got into and through Annapolis through his Admiral father's influence, that he was captured and imprisoned in Viet Nam, that in his old age he says he can't remember how many houses he owns or how much money he has, I take all these with a grain of salt. The young often grow out of their foolishness and perform a brave act, and the old sometimes forget.
I just can't bring myself to vote for someone I now know to be an adulterer.
This year I learned that John McCain met Carol Shepp, a swimsuit model from Philadelphia, in 1964. They married in '65 and had a daughter. While John was imprisoned in Nam, Carol was in an accident that ruptured her spleen, broke her arm and her hip, and crushed both her legs, leaving her six months in the hospital. Two more years and 23 operations left Carol four inches shorter than when she'd first met John. When John was released from Nam, he told friends she was "…not the woman I married." His POW status allowed him to strike up a friendship with the Reagans. While Carol worked in Ronald Reagan's 1976 presidential campaign, John had extramarital affairs. In 1979, a 42 year old John chased a 24 year old beer distributor heiress, Cindy Lou Hensley, around a buffet table set up to honor veterans, and had a relationship. Months later John shocked Carol and the Reagans with his divorce demand. I have yet to hear that the Reagans forgave him.
Now John has admitted his sin and I can forgive, as Jesus would have me do. But then, it's not hard to forgive a man for breaking his solemn promise to someone else. And if he and Carol had agreed to a divorce, releasing each other from their vows, before he started having affairs, I could forget. But John couldn't wait. And now he proposes to share the Oval Office with a former beauty pageant "Miss Congeniality". What I can't do is ever trust a man who breaks the most sacred oath a person ever takes, "…to love and to cherish…in sickness and in health…till death do us part."
I suppose there are those who would see nothing wrong with doing what John did and would find some way to defend it, but I believe that to keep our sacred oaths against the pull of animal instinct is where true courage and true character are found.
How can he ever be trusted to keep any promise he makes about judges or the unborn or anything else, if he can't keep the most sacred one?
He willfully admitted to that, I'm still wondering why Edwards hasn't taken a DNA test, of course his mistress says he doesn't need to. Of course Mr. Clinton is quite the sacred one, gee lets not forget how faithful John Kennedy was or even Ted kennedy was. Who cares they are filanders all of them, they can't keep their pants zipped.
Oh yeah, that lipstick remark was uncalled for. This is what he GOP is best for; taking the subject of the war, jobs, health insurance, gas, global warming, abortion, etc. Yeah, yeah, I can see how lipstick would be the proverbial low blow. Please, Bush ought to man up and own this war and don't forget that HE is responsible for the lives of our troops, not to mention innocent Iraqi's. Bush said he was a COWBOY & now we have the MAVERICK? Thanks but, no thanks.......
- 20 votes
on the subject of War.. Lets remind folks that it has been democrats who have brought America into more wars than anyone..Vietnam was a Democrat. The President has manned up and taken control and ownership of this War on terror. obama wants to run away and hide under his wifes dress. if you people on the left think Iraq was long and drawn out and bloody evedently you have not read history and studied Afghanistan.. You leftist better read study and learn before you get what you wish for..
- 5 votes
But we're not talking about other wars, dude. We're talking about this one.
Oh, what's that? Oh, OK. Hey Joe, 1959 called from Vietnam... they'd like their war back.
- 1 vote
Dynagirl
If you want to talk about this war, get some facts. You can go to you tube and type ---Bill Clinton: Clear Evidence of Iraqi WMD Program--- or ---President Clinton orders attack on Iraq. --- into the search bar. That will get you started and then you will see that there are many more videos that can be viewed to nullify the Democrat's claim of innocence in the Iraq war.
- 3 votes
on the subject of War.. Lets remind folks that it has been democrats who have brought America into more wars than anyone
Try again. Since the forming of the current two parties (and not counting the Cold War and small raids/actions):
Lincoln (R) Civil War
McKinley (R) Spanish American War
Wilson (D) WWI
FDR (D) WWII
Truman (D) WWII, Korea
Eisenhower (R) Korea
JFK (D) -
LBJ (D) Vietnam
Nixon (R) Vietnam
Ford (R) -
Carter (D) -
Reagan (R) -
Bush Sr. (R) Gulf War
Clinton (D) -
Bush Jr. (R) Afghanistan, Iraq
Looks relatively balanced to me.
- 1 vote
Taken control and ownership? Of what? A war HE started?
"Manning up" would primarily consist of bringing in Bin Laden, unless, of course, you had a hidden agenda.
Try again. Since the forming of the current two parties (and not counting the Cold War and small raids/actions):
Lincoln (R) Civil War
McKinley (R) Spanish American War
Wilson (D) WWI
FDR (D) WWII
Truman (D) WWII, Korea
Eisenhower (R)
JFK (D) -
LBJ (D) Vietnam
Nixon (R) -
Ford (R) -
Carter (D) - In April 1980, President Jimmy Carter sent the Army's Delta Force to bring back fifty-three American citizens held hostage in Iran. Everything went wrong
Reagan (R) -invasion of Grenada in 1983 Bombing of Libya
Bush Sr. (R) Gulf War USA Panama Invasion 1989
Clinton (D) - 1999 Kosovo War Attack on Iraq 1998 August 21, 1998 Afghanistan, Sudan
Bush Jr. (R) Afghanistan, Iraq
Looks relatively balanced to me.
- 1 vote
Here are a few little facts for the blindly led Obama supporters out there. 1.) Selma got me born...
NOT EXACTLY: your parents felt safe enough to have you in 1961 - Selma had no effect on your birth, as Selma was in 1965.
(Google 'Obama Selma' for his full March 4, 2007 speech and articles about its various untruths.) 2.) My Father Was A Goat Herder . . NOT EXACTLY: he was a privileged, well educated youth, who went on to work with the Kenyan Government. 3.) My Father Was A Proud Freedom Fighter . . . NOT EXACTLY: he was part of one of the most corrupt and violent governments Kenya has ever had. 4.) My Family Has Strong Ties To African Freedom . . . NOT EXACTLY: your cousin Raila Odinga has created mass violence in attempting to overturn a legitimate election in 2007, in Kenya. It is the first widespread violence in decades. The current government is pro-American but Odinga wants to overthrow it and establish Muslim Sharia law. Your half-brother, Abongo Obama, is Odinga's follower. You interrupted your New Hampshire campaigning to speak to Odinga on the phone. Check out the following link for verification of that and for more. Obama's cousin Odinga in Kenya ran for president and tried to get Sharia Muslim law in place there. When Odinga lost the elections, his followers burned Christians' homes as well as men, women and children alive in a Christian church where they took refuge. Obama supported his cousin before the election process here started. (Google 'Obama and Odinga') 5.) My Grandmother Has Always Been A Christian . . .
NOT EXACTLY: she does her daily Salat prayers at 5 AM according to her own interviews. Christianity would not have supported her being one of 14 wives to 1 man. 6.) My Name is African Swahili . . .
NOT EXACTLY: your name is Arabic and 'Baraka' (from which Barack came) means 'blessed' in that language. Hussein is also Arabic and so is Obama.
Barack Hussein Obama is not half black. If elected, he would be the first Arab-American President, not the first black President. Barack Hussein Obama is 50% Caucasian from his mother's side, and 43.75% Arabic and 6.25% African Negro from his father's side.
While Barack Hussein Obama's father was from Kenya, his father's family were mainly Arabs.. Barack Hussein Obama's father was only 12.5% African Negro and 87.5% Arab (his father's birth certificate states he's Arab, not African Negro). From....and for more....go to..... 7.) I Never Practiced Islam . . .
NOT EXACTLY: you practiced it daily at school, where you were registered as a Muslim and kept that faith for 31 years -- until you changed the year before running for public office.
4-3-08 Article 'Obama was 'quite religious in Islam'' 8.) My School In Indonesia Was Christian . . .
NOT EXACTLY: you were registered as Muslim there and got in trouble in Koranic Studies for making faces (check your own book). February 28, 2008. Kristoff from the New York Times a year ago: 'Mr. Obama recalled the opening lines of the Arabic call to prayer, reciting them with a first-rate accent. In a remark that seemed delightfully uncalculated (it'll give Alabama voters heart attacks), Mr. Obama described the call to prayer as 'one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset.' This is just one example of what Pamela is talking about when she says 'Obama's narrative is being altered, enhanced and manipulated to whitewash troubling facts.' 9.) I Was Fluent In Indonesian . . .
NOT EXACTLY: not one former teacher says you could speak the language. 10.) Because I lived In Indonesia, I have more foreign experience . . .
NOT EXACTLY: you were there from the ages of 6 to 10, and could not speak the language. 11.) I Am Stronger On Foreign Affairs . . .
NOT EXACTLY: except for Africa and the Middle East, you have never been anywhere else on the planet and have NO experience with our closest allies. 12.) I Blame My Early Drug Use On Ethnic Confusion . . .
NOT EXACTLY: you were quite content in high school to be Barry Obama, no mention of Kenya and no mention of struggle to identify. Your classmates said you were just fine. 13.) An Ebony Article Moved Me To Run For Office . . .
NOT EXACTLY: Ebony has yet to find the article you mention in your book. It doesn't, and never did, exist. 14.) A Life Magazine Article Changed My Outlook On Life . NOT EXACTLY: Life has yet to find the article you mention in your book. It doesn't, and never did, exist. 15.) I Won't Run On A National Ticket In '08 . . .
NOT EXACTLY: here you are, despite saying live on TV that you would not have enough experience by then -- and you are all about 'having experience first '. 16.) Voting 'Present' is Common In Illinois Senate . . .
NOT EXACTLY: common for YOU, but not many others have 130 NO VOTES. 17.) I Was A Professor Of Law . . .
NOT EXACTLY: you were a senior lecturer ON LEAVE. 18.) I Was A Constitutional Lawyer . . .
NOT EXACTLY: you were a senior lecturer ON LEAVE. 19.) Without Me, There Would Be No Ethics Bill . . .
NOT EXACTLY: you didn't write it, introduce it, change it, or create it. 20.) The Ethics Bill Was Hard To Pass . . .
NOT EXACTLY: it took just 14 days from start to finish. 21.) I Wrote A Tough Nuclear Bill . . .
NOT EXACTLY: your bill was rejected by your own party for its pandering and lack of all regulation -- mainly because of your Nuclear donor, Exelon, from which David Axelrod came. 22.) I Have Released My State Records . .
NOT EXACTLY: as of March, 2008, state bills you sponsored or voted for have yet to be released, including all the special interests pork hidden within. 23.) I Took On The Asbestos Altgeld Gardens Mess . . .
NOT EXACTLY: you were part of a large group of people who remedied Altgeld Gardens. You failed to mention anyone else but yourself in your books. 24.) My Economics Bill Will Help America . .
NOT EXACTLY: your 111 economic policies were combined into a proposal which lost 99-0, and even YOU voted against your own bill. 25.) I Have Been A Bold Leader In Illinois . .
NOT EXACTLY: even your own supporters characterize your actions as careful rather than bold. 26.) I Passed 26 Of My Own Bills In One Year . . .
NOT EXACTLY: they were not YOUR bills, but rather handed to you after their creation by a fellow Senator, 'to assist you in a future bid for higher office'. 27.) No One on my campaign contacted Canada about NAFTA . . .
NOT EXACTLY: the Canadian Government issued the names and a memo of the conversation your campaign had with them. 28.) I Am Tough On Terrorism . . .
NOT EXACTLY: you missed the Iran Resolution vote on terrorism and your good friend Ali Abunimah supports the destruction off Israel. 29.) I passed 900 Bills in the State Senate . . .
NOT EXACTLY: you passed 26, most of which you didn't write. 30.) I Believe In Fairness, Not Tactics . . .
NOT EXACTLY: you used tactics to eliminate Alice Palmer from running against you. 31.) I Don't Take PAC Money . . .
NOT EXACTLY: you take loads of it. 32.) I don't Have Lobbyists . . .
NOT EXACTLY: you have 47 lobbyists on staff, and counting. 33.) My Campaign Had Nothing To Do With The 1984 Ad . . .
NOT EXACTLY: your own campaign worker made the ad on his Apple in one afternoon. 34.) I Have Always Been Against Iraq . .
NOT EXACTLY: you weren't in office to vote against it AND you have voted to fund it every single time.
- 8 votes
SHUT UP, YOU ARE ALL NOT TELLING THE COMPLETE TRUTH, BUT THAT IS HOW THEY WIN.
8 YEARS OF HELL WANT IT AGAIN VOTE MCCAIN WANT SOMETHING NEW VOTE OBAMA.
- 4 votes
8 years of Hell???? A bit of a drama queen thing going on here isn't it??? Change for the sake of change is never a good plan. Putting a racist/socialist in the white house who has accomplished precisely "Jack"for the sake of change is just plan stupid.
- 1 vote
Greg...It isn't being a bit of drama queen if you have ACTUALLY family members who have died during the presidency of Bush. Or, better yet, visit and see for yourselves. Yes, I'd have to agree. It HAS been terrible. My own nephews are in this war and have done multiple tours in Afghanistan & Iraq.
Allow me to put in like this: Bush sold me with Afghanistan. Iraq.....No, Saddam was not the imminent threat. There are worse than him and you know it. Now, Bush has us mired in a war---for what? He has inflamed the entire middle east against us and even our European Ally's. What is wrong with you people who want to give us Bush III...We don't
want it.
I liked it when the world admired us for our humanity and strength. When it felt good to be an American. Some, when traveling deny they are from here because of EIGHT LONG YEARS.
- 2 votes
oh for those of you that don't think the last years have been hell....well lets analyze here!
1. 4,000 troops have died
2. 100,000 Iraqi's have died (who has Murdered more, Bush or Saddam HUssin?)
3. GAs prices have sky rocketed
4. HOusing Crisis (lack of oversight by the government and encouragment of capitalism by the government which allowed Freddie Mac and Frannie Mae to continue to spread the word of greed and also partly governmental affiliates)
5. Inflation
6. recession (not official but we all know it is happening when people have to rely on credit cards just to buy food)
8. stock market has had the highest points fall and market is in Bear market as well
7. I am trying to think of more, please feel free to add anymore, anyone
- 2 votes
6. recession (not official but we all know it is happening when people have to rely on credit cards just to buy food)
We are definitely in a recession my friend... 60,000 and counting have loss their jobs. Most due to companies relocating overseas.
But, guess who didn't know we were in one??? Yes, your right; good ole McCain. Must feel good to be apart of that 1% population and to have some many mansions that you can't remember the precise number?!
This man, and I quote, told the world that he wasn't aware of the recession!!! To what degree is McCain good for this country??? How can he help one of the largest crisis this country faces today (recession) when he claims no awareness of one?!
I vote OBAMA... He's real, he has 1 home (like most Americans), he's lived through poverty, and worked hard to get where he has gotten today.
McCain is no different from the rest; a silverspoon born and fed, wartime hero from the year A.D.
- 2 votes
Give 'em Hell, Barry! This is your "in" to the fight...do not flinch or all is lost!
- 5 votes
Obama and Biden need to keep this sort of thing up. The republicans are clearly running scared.
- 2 votes
Actually not running scared, but gaining support. It really helps to know how BO will address other countries with these childish derogitives.
- 4 votes
Pat G. Did you tune into Obama's overseas trip?? We've already seen him address other countries' leaders, and the respect for him was SO obvious even thousands of miles away.................respect that no US President has seen overseas in a very long time. Don't be naive.............and don't be fooled by the polls. Check out Chucky Todd's analysis of the Electoral College vote.
Intelligent people are starting to see through the whole Palin lipstick, to the nothingness beneath - both the candidate and the campaign. Let time do its work.
- 6 votes
BAJANGIRL53: Yes, unfortunately I did, and in France he used the term And-Uh over 40 times in less than five minutes. The French news picked up on it and blamed it on lack of knowledge. That is very respectful for anyone to talk that nice about him.
- 3 votes
"Did you tune into Obama's overseas trip"
How could we not, the press was falling all over themselves and trying to make everyone think it was the first time a politician has ever been overseas. Sorry it did not work out for Obama to give his speech from the Brandenburg Gate like he wanted. Just another example of Obama believing he has already been elected. Funny how it's not news when any other politicians go to Europe or Iraq.
- 4 votes
Because no one shows up:
We got a deli...er, ah, yeah, a deli for you John.
McCain stands tall and states "We are all Gherkins" and 10 people applaud.
Bajangirl, of course they loved him because he's a facist and socialist.
- 3 votes
you need serious help. please go and check in to the nearest mental hospital. i hope God don't put you to sleep first. such HATE TOWARDS THIS MAN. WHAT THE @!$%# ARE YOU'LL AFRAID OF. THE TRUTH. SUCK YOUR A.S.S AND TASTE YOUR S.H.I.T. JACK A.S.S. AND REMEMBER HE'S PART WHITE DUMBBELL.
how can he be communist and muslim....two totally different beliefs....he is Christian....but it is a waste of breathe tryting emphasize that misconception. Communism is the elimination of private property and the government eliminates economic goods. He is neither going to do that and once again he is not Muslim although there is nothing wrong with Muslims , its the Radical Muslims like the Radical Christians, like radical anything else! Sometimes it feels as though we don't live in the U.S. where a diversity of individuals prevails.
The Republicans with McCain and Palin are the definition of the word pathetic.
What should bother the American people are people in our government like Joe Lieberman, Chertoff, etc., these men are citizens of Israel.
Remember when Gore ran with Lieberman, well let's say Gore won, then he died, that means Joe Lieberman would be president right, RIGHT! Well Mr. Joe Lieberman is a citizen of the US and Israel.
Then the President of the United States would be a citizen of a foreign state, in this case Israel.
People who hold citizenship in foreign countries should not be permitted by law to hold political office in the USA.
How about Alan Greenspan and his disastrous monetary policies which have laid the foundation for the bankrupting of America, he took his oath of office on the Talmud!!! he is another proud son of Israel.
See through the smoke my friends--McCain is as close as you can get to Lieberman--Palin was just a ploy to try and garner the conservative vote--it is Lieberman who will be running things if McCain gets in--thats why Lieberman has supported McCain from the beginning--he is the sures candidate to do the bidding of Israel.
USA get out of the affairs of Israel--let Israel fight it's own wars, and send the Israeli lobby packing. One further thing you can be certain if McCain gets in then we will be in Iraq forever and in a month we will be in Iran, and will end up in WW III.
THESE ARE THE FACTS. Obama/Biden are best for the country.
- 11 votes
The support of Israel is an issue...ie an ally surround by radical muslims. This comment is just as distasteful as the jabs being throw back and forth by both parties. By the way the talmud is a commentary on the jewish bible...which is called the Torah. If everyone is saying religion isn't an issue why is are your bringing it up here. I say focus on the issues.
- 1 vote
The strange thing about all of this support for Palin is that it happened overnight, before most republicans knew anything at all about her. In fact, I would argue that most republicans STILL don't know enough about her. Their support is simply blind party line support. McCain could have picked anyone and we would be seeing the very same thing.
- 3 votes
No, they aren't blinded by the party. What they like are her glasses!! LOL Americans must be stupid!!
- 2 votes
The Junior Senator hemming and hawing on Iran
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaG6s05MKeM
Is this guy ready for that 3AM call?
- 3 votes
THE EX-INNER-CITY-COMMUNITY-ORGANIZER-EXTRAORDINAIRE'S RUSSIAN-INVASION-OF-GEORGIA GAFFE
The Junior Senator calls for the United Nations to intervene in the Russian invasion of Georgia in a very high profile long-winded speech:
Hey, Junior?
Russia?
That's the country that invaded Georgia. Yeah. The same Russia you're talking about.
Well.
Russia? Is a U.N. member!
Hey, Junior?
That means THEY, meaning Russia, CAN VETO ANY SORT OF U.N. INTERVENTION!
Way to go, Junior!
LOL!
The Junior Senator, despite his Harvard education apparently doesn't know the ABC's of how the U.N. works and doesn't know enough history to know why the U.N. was totally inept during the cold war.
Trust THIS man to be commander in Chief?
- 5 votes
Barack Hussein on traveling to all 57 States:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpGH02DtIws&feature=related
Hey, Junior? There are FIFTY States in America, OK? It's a nice ROUND NUMBER! LOL!
That Harvard education doesn't doesn't count for much does it?
LOL!!!
- 4 votes
Mike,
Obama been talking about the issues in hand , however, the media been keeping palin on the news everyday. I truly believe that Obama would luv talking about the issues if the Reps would stop bashing.
- 1 vote
Well DrWhoo, seems you are well versed on what you think OBama's stands are on the issues. Are you as well versed as to what McCain and Palins stand on the issues are? If so please share, if not...................well it's just what I expected. You simply don't know.
All you McCain and Palin supporters seem to be supporting them out of ignorance more than anything else. Not one of you has said or answered the question as to what their stands on the issues are. Your silence speaks VOLUMES! There is an old saying, "silence oft times speaks louder than words".
As a spouse of a person in the Alaskan Independence Party, Sarah will have dual citizenship when she cuts the Tundra-State loose.
I didn't know McCain needed the 3 electoral votes so badly.
I'm not going to suggest that Liebermnan is a traitor. I'm going to open, direct, and on topic, HE IS A TRATIOR.
Steve, in your opinion O/B ticket may be right for you, but in America we like our freedom from unionization and socialization so I think McCain (the true American is right for the job)DRILL BABY DRILL
- 2 votes
Eugene He's not a Traitor, he's enlightened and got tired of the B.S the Dems tossed around...He is a smart man...Go Joe Leiberman
- 2 votes
They may be best for your country, whatever that is, but not for mine, the USA.
Couldn't agree more with you Patriot. They didn't care when it was HRC running. Ask Palin some "serious" issues.
David Deacon, I agree w/you about the *new* tactic this year. This just gives them some "noise" to raise their pom poms about. There is no "substance" in this latest ruse.
- 10 votes
Superlogi -
Actually, most liberals do want a country that will let them do for themselves, e.g. live in a committed relationship (heterosexual or otherwise, I am not talking about gay-rights only) without the need for a religious or governmental blessing upon it, decide who their death benefits should go to, decide who can see them in the hospital and make life-death decisions when they cannot decide for themselves, decide to terminate a pregnancy if their life is at risk and they have living children who depend on them for their survival and upbringing, decide to end the pregnancy of a child that will live a terrible life due to painful or severely debilitating birth defects, decide they don't want the government spying on them under the pretence of national security......etc....... etc.... etc......
By the way, I'm not a Liberal. I just don't believe in party bashing based on stereo-types promoted by ignorance and intolerance.
- 1 vote
The correct spelling of the word...... Politician... not Polutaticians.... i thinks that's where the inexperience comes from....
There's only one candidate in this race that has refused to do interviews and that's Palin. How can anyone blindly support someone when they have not heard her answer a single question?
I'm tired of the double-standard here. She can make a mean-spirited speech and she's great and other people can say things that are not even in reference to her and they're supposed to apologize? Please!
I'm a woman and when I compete all I ask for is a level playing field, not special treatment. I could just see this in business. Someone imagines that someone says something about me and a male supervisor announces to the world that they should apologize. like we were on a playground. I'd die of humililation!
- 1 vote
lol... get it... read too fast!!! guess you're quicker on your feet than I was giving you credit for
I supported John McCain in 2000. In my opinion, what George W. Bush did to him in the Carolinas was despicable, and made it impossible for me to ever vote for Bush. In my view, the presidential elections are entirely about the characters of the candidates. Times change so policies change, but I believe a person's character, a person's core, is immutable. The facts about John McCain's youth, that he goofed off in school, coming in 5th from the bottom of the 899 cadets in his class, that he got into and through Annapolis through his Admiral father's influence, that he was captured and imprisoned in Viet Nam, that in his old age he says he can't remember how many houses he owns or how much money he has, I take all these with a grain of salt. The young often grow out of their foolishness and perform a brave act, and the old sometimes forget.
I just can't bring myself to vote for someone I now know to be an adulterer.
This year I learned that John McCain met Carol Shepp, a swimsuit model from Philadelphia, in 1964. They married in '65 and had a daughter. While John was imprisoned in Nam, Carol was in an accident that ruptured her spleen, broke her arm and her hip, and crushed both her legs, leaving her six months in the hospital. Two more years and 23 operations left Carol four inches shorter than when she'd first met John. When John was released from Nam, he told friends she was "…not the woman I married." His POW status allowed him to strike up a friendship with the Reagans. While Carol worked in Ronald Reagan's 1976 presidential campaign, John had extramarital affairs. In 1979, a 42 year old John chased a 24 year old beer distributor heiress, Cindy Lou Hensley, around a buffet table set up to honor veterans, and had a relationship. Months later John shocked Carol and the Reagans with his divorce demand. I have yet to hear that the Reagans forgave him.
Now John has admitted his sin and I can forgive, as Jesus would have me do. But then, it's not hard to forgive a man for breaking his solemn promise to someone else. And if he and Carol had agreed to a divorce, releasing each other from their vows, before he started having affairs, I could forget. But John couldn't wait. And now he proposes to share the Oval Office with a former beauty pageant "Miss Congeniality". What I can't do is ever trust a man who breaks the most sacred oath a person ever takes, "…to love and to cherish…in sickness and in health…till death do us part."
I suppose there are those who would see nothing wrong with doing what John did and would find some way to defend it, but I believe that to keep our sacred oaths against the pull of animal instinct is where true courage and true character are found.
How can he ever be trusted to keep any promise he makes about judges or the unborn or anything else, if he can't keep the most sacred one?
- 1 vote
Does anyone of you know someone who's divorced?? I am a divorcee, and I am also re-married. Does this mean I am also untrustworthy??? Does this mean that every person who's divorced is untrustworthy??? I am in agreement, get over it and move on to more important issues.
Couple points:
(1) Why does everyone assume he was referring to Palin? This is an old expression tossed around a lot by politicans. Huckabee doesn't even think he was calling her a pig.
(2) Why isn't McCain getting equal flack for making the exact same statement with Hillary? People argue McCain's was in response to her "legislation". Well, that's not the way a lot of people took it at the time he said it. Many were equally offended. Don't you think if Obama gets creamed for this McCain should too since people on all sides took both Obama and McCain's use of it as something derogatory?
- 15 votes
your first mistake, IMUA99, was bringing logic into an assessment of the incredibly ignorant reaction to this non-issue. But the actual answer you are looking for can be summed up in one word: Hypocrisy.
- 4 votes
Like I stated in my previous posting (15.7), it may not have been intentional, but the timing was lousy, and it was a poor choice of words. The audience definitely took it as a slam against Palin, so even if they didn't mean to be offensive, it ended up sounding that way.
- 4 votes
If it sounded that way, then oh well.
How can people call Obama a sexest, when all women want to do is be treated equally, but then Palin can be offended if she thinks a remark was made toward her... Grow up, and play the game just as good as the men if that's the case.
I'm a woman, and I hate it when I'm given special treatment, or off limit boundaries, because someone doesn't want to hurt my feelings. I've been working hard for several years to achieve goals that I've set for myself, and I don't need anyone making it easy for me because of my gender.
Personally, I would never call myself a pitbull in lipstick, but hey, to each its own. Everyone knows that pitbulls are not favored as pets among some American families, and are often put to sleep as a result of being "DISLOYAL" to their owners (American People).
But she has a problem with the statement of "putting lipstick on a pig" being used. Everyone knows that statement is used in numerous situations, not just politics, and the word lipstick did not just come about when Palin used it...
If you can't handle the heat, then get out of the kitchen Girl!
- 2 votes
Because they can't read. He was clearly talking about McCain and his policies:
On a campaign stop Tuesday, Obama criticized McCain economic policies as more of the same from the Bush administration. He said: "You can put lipstick on a pig ... it's still a pig. You can wrap an old fish in a piece of paper called change. It's still going to stink after eight years."
- 1 vote
Actually, I don't believe Palin has said anything about being offended or having a problem with the statement. From what I've seen, she's pretty fearless when it comes to competing in "a man's world". I don't think she became Governor simply because she was a woman.
Lighten up, ten0531... the pitbull joke was just that: A JOKE.
And calling her a GIRL - well, obviously that's condescending, especially coming from one who claims to be such a liberated "woman".
- 3 votes
Fedup-
First off, "Girl" is just a term used in short of "girlfriend", as to say, i'm a women too, I can relate to your effort to prove that you are just as good.... it was not condescending... you say take a joke, well it was jokingly....
Anyway... since I struck a nerve... point being, that if her comment was joke, and Obama's line(that was not even used in speaking about Palin), that was used by McCain toward Hillary's healthcare plan, should not be blown out of porportion, that's all.... Should we really be making a big deal about it.... Make sure Palin gets some royalty rights on the term "Lipstick"....
And if she doesn't have a problem with the comment, then maybe she should get with the GOP campaign and have it restructured so that it doesn't appear that she is offended or touched by the comment. Embrace it! Girl Power!!!!!!!!! oh... i'm sorry Women Power!!!!!
Fed up - You're the one that needs to lighten up. Take your own advice.
ten- sorry if I seemed touchy. After your comments about pit bulls and being put to sleep for being disloyal, yes, I was pretty defensive. If you meant it as a joke, I'm sorry.
No one is saying she should have sole claim to the word "lipstick". I do think it was either poor taste or bad timing for his speech writer to use that phrase so soon after she made the joke. The audience obviously took it to mean Sarah Palin, based on their reaction.
- 4 votes
If you saw the video and listened to the sound bite in context any intelligent person would see that he was searching for a phrase to describe the McCain campaign and how in the beginning "Mr. America First!" was all aligned with Bush in regards to foreign policy, continuing tax cuts for the wealthy and he didn't have a clue about the economy.
Fast forward to the Republican convention and the self proclaimed "Maverick" now realizes he can get more votes if he promises "change". OBama was calling McCain's campaign "a pig" and trying to illustrate how McSame is still McSame. At no time did I hear OBama say "Sarah Palin is a lipstick wearin' pig!" All of this hubbub is idiotic. Anyone that was offended by what was said needs to A) re examine why they are so angry with Obama and B) ask themselves if this election is still about the issues.
- 2 votes
fedup-
I clearly stated that I would not compare myself to a pitbull, for those reasons.... That is my opinion, not saying she shoudn't, just saying I would not want to be referred to as one, I wasn't joking about that, that is serious, those are my thoughts on pitbulls and I just wouldn't refer to myself as one, and lipstick doesn't make it better.
The term "girl" in short of "girlfriend" was in the moment innocent joking type of way.
My opinion is that its a generally used comment across the board. I just watched c-span during my lunch and they were re-airing the same comment made by McCain in reference to Hillary... I a woman, and I have worked very hard competing in the corporate world against men, and I expect no sensitivity.... I'm an equal...
If it was a joke on her end, then it should be taken lightly on the Obama campaign end, especially considering, he wasn't referring to her... Remember, we didn't even know who Palin was, when McCain made the comment, so why is it being associated with Palin now that Obama used it.... When McCain used it, no one said, "oh no, that was mean, i think the Governor of Alaska refers to herself as a "pig" or "pitbull" .... sounds silly doesn't it?
That's how it sounds for the McCain campaign to make a big deal out of it.... :)
I agree with you 100% Sabastian. Only a moron would try to twist Obama's words to make it sound as if he were insulting Palin. And when these GOPers realise just how many holes there are in this latest theory they try to pass the blame off to the audience's response. Now that's absurd!! By the way, didn't they hear the crowd's response when Palin was bashing Obama.. don't they think that was disrespectful and out of place? of course not. Finally, People are quick to say that Michelle is unpatriotic because she said that for the first time in her adult life she's proud of America because Americans now want change. Well if that's how she feels, I see NO Problem with her expressing that. There is NOTHING wrong with what she said!! I agree with her 100%, that it's only when our people wise up and make that educated and well-informed choice for proper change that we can truly be proud of ourselves. Because it's crazy to keep choosing the same thing and hoping the outcome will change. look at the state of our country!!!! We can't possibly be proud of this!!! I agree with you Michelle. There is however, something very wrong with Palin and/or her husband being members of the AIP. AIP members do not even acknowledge themselves as Americans, but Alaskans, and Palin definitely prefers to her state and town's best interest to that of the interest of all of America. She's just another republican who's good at telling lies.
- 2 votes
"Personally, I would never call myself a pitbull in lipstick, but hey, to each its own. Everyone knows that pitbulls are not favored as pets among some American families, and are often put to sleep as a result of being "DISLOYAL" to their owners (American People)."
Why did you feel the need to add the part about being "disloyal to...American People"?
Yes, we all realize that the phrase has been around for a long time. Again, my point was only that as Palin had used the line about lipstick recently in a joke that got widespread media attention, perhaps it was poor judgement to add anything about lipstick and pigs to Obama's speech. The reaction of his supporters was pretty clear. They took it to be in reference to Sarah Palin, not to a comment by McCain several months earlier.
I'm a woman too; I work in the corporate world as well, and I understand how the game is played. I don't expect special treatment, but I DO expect to be treated with respect. Which is all anyone is asking for Sarah Palin.
- 3 votes
Pat, there are many Americans who have always been VERY proud of this country. So PLEASE don't try to tell ME whether or not I should be proud.
You're right...Michelle Obama has the freedom to say whatever she pleases about this country. Just as those of us that disagree with her have the right to criticize what she said. Yes, there are things that need changing, but fundamentally our country is still the greatest in the world. We have more freedom and opportunity than any other nation on the face of the earth.
BTW, please check your facts on the AIP before you spout off incorrect information.
- 3 votes
I supported John McCain in 2000. In my opinion, what George W. Bush did to him in the Carolinas was despicable, and made it impossible for me to ever vote for Bush. In my view, the presidential elections are entirely about the characters of the candidates. Times change so policies change, but I believe a person's character, a person's core, is immutable. The facts about John McCain's youth, that he goofed off in school, coming in 5th from the bottom of the 899 cadets in his class, that he got into and through Annapolis through his Admiral father's influence, that he was captured and imprisoned in Viet Nam, that in his old age he says he can't remember how many houses he owns or how much money he has, I take all these with a grain of salt. The young often grow out of their foolishness and perform a brave act, and the old sometimes forget.
I just can't bring myself to vote for someone I now know to be an adulterer.
This year I learned that John McCain met Carol Shepp, a swimsuit model from Philadelphia, in 1964. They married in '65 and had a daughter. While John was imprisoned in Nam, Carol was in an accident that ruptured her spleen, broke her arm and her hip, and crushed both her legs, leaving her six months in the hospital. Two more years and 23 operations left Carol four inches shorter than when she'd first met John. When John was released from Nam, he told friends she was "…not the woman I married." His POW status allowed him to strike up a friendship with the Reagans. While Carol worked in Ronald Reagan's 1976 presidential campaign, John had extramarital affairs. In 1979, a 42 year old John chased a 24 year old beer distributor heiress, Cindy Lou Hensley, around a buffet table set up to honor veterans, and had a relationship. Months later John shocked Carol and the Reagans with his divorce demand. I have yet to hear that the Reagans forgave him.
Now John has admitted his sin and I can forgive, as Jesus would have me do. But then, it's not hard to forgive a man for breaking his solemn promise to someone else. And if he and Carol had agreed to a divorce, releasing each other from their vows, before he started having affairs, I could forget. But John couldn't wait. And now he proposes to share the Oval Office with a former beauty pageant "Miss Congeniality". What I can't do is ever trust a man who breaks the most sacred oath a person ever takes, "…to love and to cherish…in sickness and in health…till death do us part."
I suppose there are those who would see nothing wrong with doing what John did and would find some way to defend it, but I believe that to keep our sacred oaths against the pull of animal instinct is where true courage and true character are found.
How can he ever be trusted to keep any promise he makes about judges or the unborn or anything else, if he can't keep the most sacred one?
It was obvious he was talking about Palin. If Obama didn't mean it about Palin then he was the ONLY one clueless enough to not get it because his chosen audience was laughing before he said the punch line.
Sure, it's okay for him to refer to Palin as a pig. That WOULD be okay with the stupid Obama supporters because they don't care WHAT he does.
They could walk in and see him munching on the head of a dead baby and say it was Hillary's fault. Or McCain's fault. Or the government's fault.
There is just no logical thinking in a die-hard Obama supporter.
Was McCain referring to Hillary when he used the same anecdote during the primaries refering and shouldn't he be held to the same scrutiny that he is putting Obama through. I used to have respect for McCain but I am quickly loosing it. His only political tactics are to sling mud and divert attention from the issues. He has yet to give us an plan of substance. Wake up republicans, we don't need another Bush era.
Look, if you can dish then you should be able to take it. McCain used that same common phrase against Hillary's plans, but people are crying foul when Obama uses it against McCain's plans. Is anyone else sick of McCain/Palin image of self-importance? GET OUT OF PALIN'S SKIRT, McCain! Or is it pants? She wants to be treated fairly like the men, but wants to send them all to sensitivity training at the same time. The one thing that Morning Joe really hit the nail on (oops. should I have said that?) is that Obama needs a fire lit under his butt. Stop releasing these lame kid glove wearing statements to the press, get on tv, and really stick it to McCain. To heck with Palin. Her real power lands in all the news coverage. Take it from her! As much as I detest Bill O'Reilly, he really kept Obama on the straight and narrow (did it again!) and really showed how tough Obama can be. Obama's camp really need to shake it off and shake things up. Everytime I see him I want to just slap him...where is Michele when he needs her?
- 10 votes
Yes, McCain used it againt Hillary's PLAN, not her personally. Barack Hussein Obama viciously attacked Sarah Palin.
Way to go Barack! What an image to convey to middle America. A vicious talking black man attacking a white woman. Yeah, that will go over well with independents.
- 4 votes
Obama didn't use it personally he was talking about McBush trying to say that he is for change.... Maybe he is, a diaper change for him that is.... he belongs in a nursing home not the white house..... Obama is above making it personal, I don't, I would have said, "If you put lipstick on a slut from Alaska, you still have a slut from Alaska!"
- 2 votes
I agree, its time for Obama to really let the McCain/P...ooopss Palin/McCain campaign have a dose of reality. He's very respectful, but at this point, the issues need to be driven hard into their heads. Palin has been given a pass away from the media and real conversation with real humans, not just a telepromptr...
Obama, we are behind you!!!
- 1 vote
fedup-
Don't be so petty about my word for word analogy of pitbulls, I told you that is my opinion. Pitbulls have a reputation of not being favored amoung American Families, I would have used something a little more favorable. But she used the term pitbull, to signify strenght, and aggression, but to say, i'm still a lady with lipstick. If I were running for VP, i would not have used any type of stereotypical comments such as lip stick (eye liner, high heeled pumps or anything else) Because men have been known to put women into a little box, considering we are only good for being beautiful and air headed, which is the reason us woman have to work so hard to gain the respect of co-workers, and men period. I know how the game goes, and I wouldn't want the American people to think, the only way I can describe myself as being a hard working reformer that doesn't give in easily, is by putting on Lipstick.... For example, i don't even wear lipstick, perhaps a gloss or some sort of shimmer all day finish type deal, so she really didn't appeal to all American women, as she attempted to.
It was a poor choice of words for Palin, i believe... She set herself up.
I didn't know that there was a time lag between when the Republican Party could use the term lipstick and when the democratic party could use lipstick....
Perhaps he should have changed it from lipstick to sunglasses or a wig, would it have been the same reaction or different...
Everyone knows that these teleprompted speeches are organized, Dem reacted the same way they did when Palin used the term Lipstick on a pitbull... They went into a frenzy...
It's politics... get in the game or get out...
- 1 vote
Palin has been given a pass from the media? Are you delusional? The media has been bashing her since she was announced as the VP candidate, where have you been? Sen. Obama has not only never answered to anybody's satisfaction about his associations with Wright, Ayers, Phleger, Resko, Farrakan; he's never even been asked the questions! And I really don't think you want Sen. Obama doing much speaking without HIS teleprompter. UH..um..UH..UH... UMM
If you want the media to question the candidates then let them, ALL of them. No more free pass for Sen. Obama.
- 2 votes
stillkickin-
I rather hear um uh um, between a few words, than something that has been written for Palin, and might i add, i'm really tired of hearing that "Bridge to nowhere" comment...
I would like to see some interviews, what can she say and support on her own... that's all... How has Sen Obama been given a pass from the media, when he is interviewed on a daily basis about things going on, and what's being said... The only one that has not is Palin.... We don't even hear um uh um...
i'm sure you use um's and uh's... or are you perfect!
Too bad that Obama has to go into a speach rather than answer a direct question with a direct answer. As far as I am concerned all he did was dodge and duck the answers.
- 1 vote
I supported John McCain in 2000. In my opinion, what George W. Bush did to him in the Carolinas was despicable, and made it impossible for me to ever vote for Bush. In my view, the presidential elections are entirely about the characters of the candidates. Times change so policies change, but I believe a person's character, a person's core, is immutable. The facts about John McCain's youth, that he goofed off in school, coming in 5th from the bottom of the 899 cadets in his class, that he got into and through Annapolis through his Admiral father's influence, that he was captured and imprisoned in Viet Nam, that in his old age he says he can't remember how many houses he owns or how much money he has, I take all these with a grain of salt. The young often grow out of their foolishness and perform a brave act, and the old sometimes forget.
I just can't bring myself to vote for someone I now know to be an adulterer.
This year I learned that John McCain met Carol Shepp, a swimsuit model from Philadelphia, in 1964. They married in '65 and had a daughter. While John was imprisoned in Nam, Carol was in an accident that ruptured her spleen, broke her arm and her hip, and crushed both her legs, leaving her six months in the hospital. Two more years and 23 operations left Carol four inches shorter than when she'd first met John. When John was released from Nam, he told friends she was "…not the woman I married." His POW status allowed him to strike up a friendship with the Reagans. While Carol worked in Ronald Reagan's 1976 presidential campaign, John had extramarital affairs. In 1979, a 42 year old John chased a 24 year old beer distributor heiress, Cindy Lou Hensley, around a buffet table set up to honor veterans, and had a relationship. Months later John shocked Carol and the Reagans with his divorce demand. I have yet to hear that the Reagans forgave him.
Now John has admitted his sin and I can forgive, as Jesus would have me do. But then, it's not hard to forgive a man for breaking his solemn promise to someone else. And if he and Carol had agreed to a divorce, releasing each other from their vows, before he started having affairs, I could forget. But John couldn't wait. And now he proposes to share the Oval Office with a former beauty pageant "Miss Congeniality". What I can't do is ever trust a man who breaks the most sacred oath a person ever takes, "…to love and to cherish…in sickness and in health…till death do us part."
I suppose there are those who would see nothing wrong with doing what John did and would find some way to defend it, but I believe that to keep our sacred oaths against the pull of animal instinct is where true courage and true character are found.
How can he ever be trusted to keep any promise he makes about judges or the unborn or anything else, if he can't keep the most sacred one?
Gary,
You have so nailed it. If a man can't keep his wedding vows, how the h*** can we trust him to be president!
Yes, critics will say the Clinton cheated on his wife too, but the big difference here...and its a big one...the Clinton's are still together!! Just like the Edwards are!! It really says something about a couple who's marriages can survive such a betrayal. But the fact is, McCain didn't want to work things out with his first wife, he wanted to be free to chase skirts, to marry his ho.
It's very interesting how he chooses what he's going to be faithful to.
Ten, nope never claimed to be perfect - sounds like you have the patent on that.
I told you in the previous post 19.7 how Sen. Obama has gotten a pass. When George Stephanopolus (sp) asked him about Ayers all the dems acted like he was questioning His Holiness. Even if the questions of Wright, Ayers, Phleger, Resko, Farrakan are asked either Sen. Obama or a campaign spokesman goes in to total defensive mode and either evades the question or tries to berate whoever asked it. You want answers about Sarah Palin, fine. I want answers about Obama, whats the difference? Are only the Dems allowed to ask questions and get them answered? It sure seems like it. After 19 months of campaigning Obama STILL has not answered these questions. In one week the media, urged on by the dems have tried to tear Gov. Palin AND her family apart. Even now the dems have over 30, yes 30 lawyers and investigaors in Alaska trying to dig up any little piece of dirt they can find on her. You call that getting a pass? I don't have any problem with all of knowing everything we can about the candidates, ALL the candidates.
Oh yeah and as far as the ums and uhs go, stop with the "she can't speak without a teleprompter" stuff when your overblown candidate can't either.
- 1 vote
Gary Andrews and Brooket, question for you - Obama says in 20 years that he never heard Rev. Wright say what he reiterated at the National Press Club luncheon. Do you believe that? If he can't tell the truth about that how can we trust him to keep any promises he makes.
Yes Sen. McCain got a divorce from his first wife, get over it. You make it sound like he is the only divorced person in this country.
- 1 vote
I am a CHRISTIAN that understands the word of God so to see the word of God coming to life makes me to know that God is God.
The Bible teaches us that to be forgiven for ones sin, one must stop sinning. Even if a person asks for forgiveness but continues to make sin ones lifestyle those sins will not be forgiven until the sin is stopped.
2 Chronicles 7
14If my own people will humbly pray and turn back to me and stop sinning, then I will answer them from heaven. I will forgive them and make their land fertile once again.
The Bible teaches us the below scriptures:
Mark 10
11 He told them, "Whoever divorces his wife and marries someone else commits adultery against her. 12 And if a woman divorces her husband and marries someone else, she commits adultery."
1 Corinthians 6
9 Don't you realize that those who do wrong will not inherit the Kingdom of God? Don't fool yourselves. Those who indulge in sexual sin, or who worship idols, or commit adultery, or are male prostitutes, or practice homosexuality, 10 or are thieves, or greedy people, or drunkards, or are abusive, or cheat people—none of these will inherit the Kingdom of God.
In the above scripture we find that an adulterer is one that divorces its mate for another which makes the adulterer not represent God. In its present condition, the adulterer will go to hell.
As you can see, God puts the homosexual and the adulterer in the same category as He does not make a difference between the two. In their present condition, both are hell bound. Therefore, those conservatives that support John McCain should either not support McCain or shut up about the homosexuals and those that abort their babies because their hypocritical ways are doing more harm than good to the Kingdom of God. If they are sincere, they can speak out against homosexuals, adulterers fornicators etc but they would have to go against John McCain as one can not coexist with the other.
It puzzles me that any Catholic or Jewish person would vote for McCain especially since the Jewish people shun adulterers and the Catholic .
Church will not marry you if you committed adultery.
This brings us to why the conservatives crucify gays while supporting John McCain the adulterer! If you do not know by now, John McCain left his "crippled" wife for a young, rich woman, Cindy, his current wife. He admitted to being an adulterer. No, God will not forgive John for simply admitting that he is an adulterer because he MUST stop sinning. God does not recognize John and Cindy McCain's marriage as He sees them as living in sin. Therefore, John MUST divorce Cindy and either return to Carol, his first wife, or remain celibate. John has done neither condition, which means that John McCain is STILL an adulterer regardless of his confession. Repentance means to stop the sin as well as the changing of ones mind towards that sin. Since the Evangelicals/conservatives know this about McCain, then why would the Evangelicals throw their support behind an adulterer? Isn't this picking and choosing which sin to accept and which sin to attack? Of course it is which would make ANYONE that say that they are a Christian and support McCain to be a hypocrite! They cannot rebuke the homosexuals or those that abort because they are just as guilty for supporting an adulterer. God will condemn them just as He will condemn John McCain.
The Evangelicals/conservatives that support McCain know about this but they do not want you to know about their sin as they want to appear righteous but they are just as sinful as the ones that abort their babies, homosexuals etc. These people are Pharisees as in the Bible; the Pharisees pushed the government agenda just as those conservatives for John are doing to do.
The Evangelicals/conservatives that support John McCain say that they care about this country but why would you want McCain, the adulterer, to be the leader of the free world. Doesn't this country supposed to represent God? Well, having John as president is not sending a message of godliness but one against God. How can this country be taken seriously for being a godly country when the people selected a man who is against God? How can McCain go before leaders condemning their actions when his own actions need to be condemned? He cannot talk about Bin Laden for killing people because from the Bible standpoint killing and adultery breaks God's commandment which means that John McCain is not any better than Bin Laden. God will punish this country for putting John McCain as president because John cannot represent a godly country. God will not be with this country if John becomes president because John McCain is an adulterer. We will be sinning against God and look what happened to the children of Israel for sinning against God. After what Bush did to this country and the Evangelicals supporting John McCain, I can see how the anti-Christ takes over the world. McCain and Bush are preparing for the anti-Christ.
Therefore, when you hear someone that claims to be a Christian that votes for John McCain, remind them of the scriptures that I posted and ask them if they are following the word of God or if they are going against God's word. Call them out and call them a HYPOCRITE because that is what they are, a HYPOCRITE. Let them know that God is not pleased with their action.
Remember, there are Evangelicals/conservatives that will not vote for John McCain for that reason so hypocrite will not apply to them but to those that vote for John McCain as they cannot serve two gods! It is either they are for God or against God as there is no lukewarm. God will spew them out because their actions are teaching a different theology from God's word the One that they profess to follow. In the Bible, in Romans 2, God talks about the outcome of the Evangelicals/conservatives, Christians that are calling themselves a Christians but is not living by the word.
- 1 vote
IMO, the Evangelical Christians are fundamentalist extremist's. What they fail to see is their brand of fundamentalism is not much different than the Islamic Fundamentalists.
Perhaps extremists of any ilk have no place in politics especially when it comes to policy.
As young as I was at the time, I recall during the JFK bid for the presidency one of the big issues was his Catholicism and how his opponents would have you believe that the Vatican would be running the country and here we are bowing to Christian Conservatives.
Obama's comment shows the kind of man he is. It was immature and mean spirited because things were not going his way. I think a leader ought to be able to be 'above the fray' and not respond emotionally to situations. He ought to retain his dignity in spite of being frustrated. Otherwise he-she will lose his-her ability to remain objective in spite of personal disappointments. If he cannot do that; how are we to trust him to make decisions the are good for the country and not just spiteful.
- 5 votes
And what did it show when McCain said it? Did you forget that or just conveniently ignored it?
Who's emotional? McCain and Palin who complain about supposed being called racists or pigs? Or Obama who says Palin's kids should be off-limits and John McCain's service was honorable? A ticket of whiners for the GOP and a ticket of gentlemen for the Dems. May the best men win!
- 17 votes
"He-she" will lose "his-her" ability? To whom are you referring? Obama? It's pretty clear that Barack Obama is a man.
- 2 votes
When, or if, you read the transcript, you'll see that Obama was clearly referring to McCain's policies. Nowhere in the lead-up to the pig comment did he refer to Palin or even McCain as a person. He was referring solely to McCain's policies. To infer any differently is disingenuous.
- 11 votes
You must have pirchased one o f thos objects I refered to earlier.
Obama's comment shows the kind of man he is. It was immature and mean spirited because things were not going his way.
Let's not get ahead of ourselves and forget what the great McCain said in regards to Chelsea Clinton. "WHY IS CHELSEA CLINTON SO UGLY? BECAUSE HER FATHER IS JANET RENO" Tell me, what was mature and nice spirited about this????? Nice try...
- 7 votes
You must have pirchased one o f thos objects I refered to earlier
Hay lawgdumper, yew mite wawna pirchase a dicshunary - or get that pacifier out of your mouth!
- 1 vote
Apparently, no one read the article before coming here to discuss it. I have to leave this discussion - it's giving me a headache --
For those who care about being informed in order to form an intelligent opinion, here (from the article you are discussing):
NORFOLK, Va. - Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama on Wednesday accused Republican John McCain's campaign of using "lies and phony outrage and Swift-boat politics" in claiming he used a sexist comment against vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin.
On Tuesday, Obama criticized McCain's policies as similar to those of President Bush, saying: "You can put lipstick on a pig. It's still a pig. You can wrap an old fish in a piece of paper called change. It's still going to stink after eight years."
I think McCain is actually drawing attention to the pig in lipstick because he doesn't want people to connect him with the "old fish" - still stinking, McCain!
~
- 4 votes
Pat. Please read Tory Clarks book. Please Google 'Lipstick on a Pig". Untill then, please refrain from calling someone mean spirited.
A short excerpt of his press secretary's book is listed on this sight. Please read it.
Thank you
Kind Regards
I supported John McCain in 2000. In my opinion, what George W. Bush did to him in the Carolinas was despicable, and made it impossible for me to ever vote for Bush. In my view, the presidential elections are entirely about the characters of the candidates. Times change so policies change, but I believe a person's character, a person's core, is immutable. The facts about John McCain's youth, that he goofed off in school, coming in 5th from the bottom of the 899 cadets in his class, that he got into and through Annapolis through his Admiral father's influence, that he was captured and imprisoned in Viet Nam, that in his old age he says he can't remember how many houses he owns or how much money he has, I take all these with a grain of salt. The young often grow out of their foolishness and perform a brave act, and the old sometimes forget.
I just can't bring myself to vote for someone I now know to be an adulterer.
This year I learned that John McCain met Carol Shepp, a swimsuit model from Philadelphia, in 1964. They married in '65 and had a daughter. While John was imprisoned in Nam, Carol was in an accident that ruptured her spleen, broke her arm and her hip, and crushed both her legs, leaving her six months in the hospital. Two more years and 23 operations left Carol four inches shorter than when she'd first met John. When John was released from Nam, he told friends she was "…not the woman I married." His POW status allowed him to strike up a friendship with the Reagans. While Carol worked in Ronald Reagan's 1976 presidential campaign, John had extramarital affairs. In 1979, a 42 year old John chased a 24 year old beer distributor heiress, Cindy Lou Hensley, around a buffet table set up to honor veterans, and had a relationship. Months later John shocked Carol and the Reagans with his divorce demand. I have yet to hear that the Reagans forgave him.
Now John has admitted his sin and I can forgive, as Jesus would have me do. But then, it's not hard to forgive a man for breaking his solemn promise to someone else. And if he and Carol had agreed to a divorce, releasing each other from their vows, before he started having affairs, I could forget. But John couldn't wait. And now he proposes to share the Oval Office with a former beauty pageant "Miss Congeniality". What I can't do is ever trust a man who breaks the most sacred oath a person ever takes, "…to love and to cherish…in sickness and in health…till death do us part."
I suppose there are those who would see nothing wrong with doing what John did and would find some way to defend it, but I believe that to keep our sacred oaths against the pull of animal instinct is where true courage and true character are found.
How can he ever be trusted to keep any promise he makes about judges or the unborn or anything else, if he can't keep the most sacred one?
Come on McCain you're wasting our time.
The expression is one you've used yourself
What about the issues - where's the beef man?
I supported John McCain in 2000. In my opinion, what George W. Bush did to him in the Carolinas was despicable, and made it impossible for me to ever vote for Bush. In my view, the presidential elections are entirely about the characters of the candidates. Times change so policies change, but I believe a person's character, a person's core, is immutable. The facts about John McCain's youth, that he goofed off in school, coming in 5th from the bottom of the 899 cadets in his class, that he got into and through Annapolis through his Admiral father's influence, that he was captured and imprisoned in Viet Nam, that in his old age he says he can't remember how many houses he owns or how much money he has, I take all these with a grain of salt. The young often grow out of their foolishness and perform a brave act, and the old sometimes forget.
I just can't bring myself to vote for someone I now know to be an adulterer.
This year I learned that John McCain met Carol Shepp, a swimsuit model from Philadelphia, in 1964. They married in '65 and had a daughter. While John was imprisoned in Nam, Carol was in an accident that ruptured her spleen, broke her arm and her hip, and crushed both her legs, leaving her six months in the hospital. Two more years and 23 operations left Carol four inches shorter than when she'd first met John. When John was released from Nam, he told friends she was "…not the woman I married." His POW status allowed him to strike up a friendship with the Reagans. While Carol worked in Ronald Reagan's 1976 presidential campaign, John had extramarital affairs. In 1979, a 42 year old John chased a 24 year old beer distributor heiress, Cindy Lou Hensley, around a buffet table set up to honor veterans, and had a relationship. Months later John shocked Carol and the Reagans with his divorce demand. I have yet to hear that the Reagans forgave him.
Now John has admitted his sin and I can forgive, as Jesus would have me do. But then, it's not hard to forgive a man for breaking his solemn promise to someone else. And if he and Carol had agreed to a divorce, releasing each other from their vows, before he started having affairs, I could forget. But John couldn't wait. And now he proposes to share the Oval Office with a former beauty pageant "Miss Congeniality". What I can't do is ever trust a man who breaks the most sacred oath a person ever takes, "…to love and to cherish…in sickness and in health…till death do us part."
I suppose there are those who would see nothing wrong with doing what John did and would find some way to defend it, but I believe that to keep our sacred oaths against the pull of animal instinct is where true courage and true character are found.
How can he ever be trusted to keep any promise he makes about judges or the unborn or anything else, if he can't keep the most sacred one?
Toady, that IS their ONLY point/beef. To keep US & the media occupied by "feigning" fake outrage so we don't have to discuss the REAL issues; war, dead soldiers, economy, health care, global warming, gas. Also, the other point is to "prep" Palin for the "serious" questions, which of course, will be Bush's, er, McCains.
McCain didn't think it was offensive when he used the exact same expression about Hillary Clinton. Do they really think we are this stupid?
- 15 votes
sad thing is THEY are that stupid,to conveniently forget what anyone says,they aren't really listening just reacting,this election is like a game to be won,not what is best for country that's what republicans do,spread hate,fear,if that's not working yell foul play,and ignore all facts that make them look bad!
- 7 votes
Michelle,
Stupidity is not knowitng how to properly punctuate a sentence!!!!! Go back to third grade.
- 1 vote
Michelle- How have Republicans spread hate? Do you have any specific examples?
And by spreading fear, I assume you mean that we do bring up the fact that we're at war against radical Islamic terrorists, and (as was mentioned on the national news last night), there is still a very real threat of attack. Perhaps we believe that the best person to be in control at this time is someone with military experience who understands what needs to be done.
If you choose to call us names because we don't agree with your political views, I can't stop you. However, it does seriously undermine your entire argument.
- 2 votes
I supported John McCain in 2000. In my opinion, what George W. Bush did to him in the Carolinas was despicable, and made it impossible for me to ever vote for Bush. In my view, the presidential elections are entirely about the characters of the candidates. Times change so policies change, but I believe a person's character, a person's core, is immutable. The facts about John McCain's youth, that he goofed off in school, coming in 5th from the bottom of the 899 cadets in his class, that he got into and through Annapolis through his Admiral father's influence, that he was captured and imprisoned in Viet Nam, that in his old age he says he can't remember how many houses he owns or how much money he has, I take all these with a grain of salt. The young often grow out of their foolishness and perform a brave act, and the old sometimes forget.
I just can't bring myself to vote for someone I now know to be an adulterer.
This year I learned that John McCain met Carol Shepp, a swimsuit model from Philadelphia, in 1964. They married in '65 and had a daughter. While John was imprisoned in Nam, Carol was in an accident that ruptured her spleen, broke her arm and her hip, and crushed both her legs, leaving her six months in the hospital. Two more years and 23 operations left Carol four inches shorter than when she'd first met John. When John was released from Nam, he told friends she was "…not the woman I married." His POW status allowed him to strike up a friendship with the Reagans. While Carol worked in Ronald Reagan's 1976 presidential campaign, John had extramarital affairs. In 1979, a 42 year old John chased a 24 year old beer distributor heiress, Cindy Lou Hensley, around a buffet table set up to honor veterans, and had a relationship. Months later John shocked Carol and the Reagans with his divorce demand. I have yet to hear that the Reagans forgave him.
Now John has admitted his sin and I can forgive, as Jesus would have me do. But then, it's not hard to forgive a man for breaking his solemn promise to someone else. And if he and Carol had agreed to a divorce, releasing each other from their vows, before he started having affairs, I could forget. But John couldn't wait. And now he proposes to share the Oval Office with a former beauty pageant "Miss Congeniality". What I can't do is ever trust a man who breaks the most sacred oath a person ever takes, "…to love and to cherish…in sickness and in health…till death do us part."
I suppose there are those who would see nothing wrong with doing what John did and would find some way to defend it, but I believe that to keep our sacred oaths against the pull of animal instinct is where true courage and true character are found.
How can he ever be trusted to keep any promise he makes about judges or the unborn or anything else, if he can't keep the most sacred one?
McCain did not use it in any reference to Hillary.
Obama DID use it as a reference to Palin and you know it!
Otherwise, why did his chosen audience laugh before he gave the punchline?
Is, "You can put lipstick on a pig" a funny comment? No, it is not.
I suggest you watch the video and you will KNOW that Obama was referring to Palin.
I watched it several times and what you are spreading is propaganda. Did you cry out when McCain and Cheney used it? So, why are you doing so now?
- 2 votes
Who the hell wants a President who can't parse a simple sentence and figure out it's meaning. McLame.
- 7 votes
He stumbled quite a bit over what the word honour means,I can see he does not have any honour so can understand to him it only means fighting in a war from 40 yrs ago.What has mcain the creature of washington that he is done for America lately? NOTHING but pass some gas and introduce another pig to washington.How is palin change?she is campaigning with same speech from GOP convention,and lieing about that stupid bridge,where did the bridge money go,she kept it,so why bring it up?Because it's all she has for "change" and her followers only care that she looks like me!
- 3 votes
I can see he does not have any honour so can understand to him it only means fighting in a war from 40 yrs ago.What has mcain the creature of washington that he is done for America lately? NOTHING but pass some gas and introduce another pig to washington
I don't care if McCain was a soldier 100 years ago, you NEVER EVER EVER take away from ANYONE who went to war for your freedom(s) - It doesn't matter if you are Republican, Democrat, or Martian - He fought for you and me and America, and nearly lost his life several times while doing so. To discredit him is to discredit ALL who have served and died. Please try to remain patriotic as hard as it may be for you.
- 3 votes
Look at his record in the Senate, then get back to us, JackB.
I'm not surprised you don't understand the American definition of honor (assuming from your spelling of it you're not from here). My grandfather was at Omaha Beach on D-Day; my uncle was in the Battle of the Bulge; their other two brothers were in Europe fighting the war as well. My other grandfather was a Navy chief in the Korean war. Do I consider them heroes? Yes. Did those conflicts take place 60+ years ago? Yes. Have they done things in their lives I disagree with? Yes.
Do I still think they have honor? Yes.
- 2 votes
fedupwithliberals,
I apologize, but I am new to newsvine (somewhat) and incorrectly quoted my reply and not Michelle - 356612's comment. My comment was the one in italics below the insulting, disrespectful one directed at McCain (the soldier 40 years ago)...and honor is a word I am very familiar with. I too have many members of my family who have served and some died serving this nation. As you will read in my italic reply to Michelle 356612, I find it unacceptable for a fellow American to discount the service of any soldier - no matter how long ago.
God Bless,
JackB
McCain / Palin 08' / 12'
- 3 votes
Thanks for clarifying, JackB! Sorry if I offended you in any way.
I love it - keep getting more desperate McCain campaign. It's so ironic (yet not surprising) that they would have the gall to pretend outrage after what they said about and laughed about Hillary Clinton and Obama in the last 18 months. I am actually going to work for the Democrats this election - something I haven't done since campaigning for McGovern. I absolutely can not sit by and watch my country continue to be hijacked by complete ideologues, religions nutjobs, partisanship and vitirol. I encourage all Democrats and smart Republicans to work and take back the America I grew up in. I barely recognize the one I have now after 8 years.....
I read the blogs and comments and am absolutely amazed that after 18 million votes and almost as long on the campaign trail, people can say (with a straight face) they don't 'know' Obama but after one 38 minute speech and a single vote (by McCain) they can robotically chant 'sarah sarah sarah'. That the Republicans can have a 3 day convention that is filled with sarcasm, belittling, mischaractarization of Democrats and not a single substantative speech and yet have people on this and other boards claiming some sort of high road.
Where are the moderate Republicans? Aren't you outraged at your party leaders? This is where the outrage should be.
- 13 votes
Totally agree Janice. This whole "lipstick on a pig" thing is a joke. For almost 20 months we've watched Barack Obama being ripped apart, from his faith, to his acquaintances, to his intelligence, to his wife and on and on and on and yet he has run his campaign with class and dignity. And he makes a comment which had NOTHING to do with Palin and it's outrage coming from the other side. I am amazed that the McCain campaign can get up there and lie and lie and lie and even after it's proven, you Republicans find no problem with it. I think you people are trying to distract us from the fact that your VP candidate is no more qualified to run than a pig in a prom dress. Oops. No, the point is this person is running for what could be the highest office in OUR country too and we have EVERY right to know who she is. Your logic has been "You can't say anything about him, he's old and a POW. You can't say anything about her because she's a woman". Are you kidding me????
Oh, and by the way, the latest McCain ad sinks to new lows. If "I'm John McCain and I approve this ad" thinks that this ad isn't deplorable, then my friends, he's even sicker than I thought.
- 9 votes
Janice after all that's been said here I agree most with what you have elected to share. Enough of the games like Barack said in his acceptance speech. Why has the republican party not been outraged when a leader of their nominees campaign is advocating for an election based on relationship and not issues. How will a relationship help people who become ill with no insurance, kids that graduate and are unable to go to college because of cost, rising energy cost and tainted foreign policy decisions. Never before in an election have I been so confused by the content of America's character. In any figft there has to be a winner and a looser here I'm truly afraid the American people will loose with a McCain/Palin ticket. The response from the republican camp is not even predicated on policy it's as if we owe McCain more than a thank you for serving our country. Trust me as a veteran thanks is quite sufficient. The republican response is like watching an episode of Jerry Springer now I know why he's still on television. The comment made by Obama was not meant to do anything but link Sarah with the McCain and Bush policies I see no sexism in a adage that's as old as time and those that are here advocating for anything more than that are confused and bewildered by the potential of loosing this campaign to Obama. I would really like to believe that McCain will put this country on the right path but how can someone not capable of using a computer understand the computer age, someone living in seven houses understand loosing the one home people have worked for and lived in for years, coming out and stating he has no understanding of economics and lead a country out of a recession and a $9 trillion in debt. How many jokes on the American people will it take to get it that it's not about the candidate it's about the destination of the country. I pray there are enough of us that get and demonstrate it with a vote on 11/04 because four years of guessing will not get it done.
- 4 votes
Wow! They want Obama to do what.....? After that cover of the New Yorker! I tell you what....we Democrats will take the higher road and say.... well she shouldn't have taken in so much of that "Pork Belly" funds from Congress for Alaska...and all you Republican can take the "Bridge to Nowhere!" Oink! Oink!
- 6 votes
The last two weeks? Excuse me but she wasn't even really introduced until Sept 3rd when she gave her speech at the RNC. That was the first anyone really heard of her. And the only thing I ever read that Obama said about her was actually very flattering and positive. As far as the lipstick comment, it had nothing to do with Palin and is a non issue. Let's move on people.
It is too bad Obama supporters don't do any research and are so quick to believe every lie that is posted about Palin yet keep forgiving Obama for everything as "guilt by association" or "it's Hillary's fault".
Obama is plummeting lower and lower in the polls and is now acting like a spoiled 5 year old. He thought he was pretty funny with the lipstick comment but now that people are angry about it he is trying to lie and say he didn't mean it against Palin. anybody who watches the video of what he said KNOWS it was aimed at Palin.
Why not just admit it? Are you ashamed that your hero is so tacky?
like that puppet john mcsane. you want to talk about tacky....talk about that bum your trying to get elected. That war monger and that b**** that's trying to win by using her baby and her son that's heading to Iraq tell them to talk about the issue and you need to rethink who your voting for idiot.
Oh get over it. If Obama is immature, then McCain is an even bigger baby. He was trailing behind Obama and paled in comparison to Obama's popularity. So what does he do? Gets his mommy, I mean a woman, to do his dirty work for him. I don't know who's suckling whom, McCain using a woman to fight his battles or Palin being shield from the press. Don't judge Obama for something the McCain has been doing for over a year...maybe longer.
- 9 votes
Oh AnneNorr!!! You get a standing ovation on that one!!
EVERY WOMAN IN AMERICA should be offended at this woman and John McCain. She has talked and talked and talked, but never has she said one single word on what she and McCain intend to do for us, The People Of America. All she has done is parade around like Miss America, relying solely on the fact that she will get the woman's vote, because she is one, and the men's vote because she's "hot?"
I was, and still am, offended at the pins being worn at her acceptance speech. They said "I vote for McCain and the Cute Chick". And there she stood like an oaf smiling and grinning like she was smart.
What on earth??!
No wonder other countries think we are stupid. Hello?!
It's apparent that she has been chosen ONLY because she is a woman, and not even a really smart woman.
How can America possibly be led by a President that is so wrapped up in how beautiful and sexy his Partner is, and how good-looking he is himself? And how long before Mr.and Ms. McCain began having problems over the same subject?
Cigar, anyone?
And Obama owes her an apology? For what? I thought he was being too kind. A pig does not display sneaky and sometimes deadly behavior. A pit bull does.
We all know what is female dog is.
Has everyone seen the Palin dolls? It's an embarrassment to this country. Obama was DEFINITELY too kind. Looks like the country isn't the only thing waiting to get schrewed.
Halter tops, leather jacket, leather boots and strapped with machine guns? The woman's a hoochy.
What kind of a message is this sending to our daughters?
Well girls; it's an age old profession. As long as you have one of them there "lilltle ole things" you can get anything you want.
THAT'S what it says.
It says woman are stupid.
- 3 votes
Please don't tell me what I should be offended at.
I didn't see the pins you mentioned; were they being worn by the protesters down the street who were bashing in storefront windows?
How does one become the Governor of Alaska without being at least somewhat intelligent?
Calling the VP nominee a b--- and a prostitute is real classy. Is that the best you can do?
Where did you see these "dolls" you mentioned? Were they advertised on the Daily Kos? Or Moveon.org?
YOU offend me, LadyOrangeDog.
- 3 votes
Cigar, anyone?
Too late, The last Democratic president already used it in the White House...
Well girls; it's an age old profession. As long as you have one of them there "lilltle ole things" you can get anything you want.
Then try trading your "lil' ol' thang' in for some brains - I'm sure it would probably be of more use
Hmmmmm
You couldn't get a job at McDonalds and become district manager after 143 days of experience.
You couldn't become Chief of Surgery after 143 days of experience of being a surgeon.
You couldn't get a job as a teacher and be the Superintendent of Schools after 143 days of experience.
You couldn't join the military and become a Colonel after a 143 days of experience.
You couldn't get a job as a reporter and become the nightly news anchor after 143 days of experience.
BUT....
'From the time Barack Obama was sworn in as a United State Senator, to the time he announced he was forming a Presidential exploratory committee, he logged 143 days of experience in the Senate.
That's how many days the Senate was actually in session and working. After 143 days of work experience, Obama believed he was ready to be Commander In Chief, Leader of the Free World .... 143 days.
We all have to start somewhere. The senate is a good start, but after 143 days, that's all it is - just a start. AND, strangely, a large sector of the American public is okay with this and campaigning for him.
We wouldn't accept this in our own line of work, yet some are okay with this for the President of the United States of America ?
Come on folks, we are not voting for the next American Idol
- 10 votes
If you vote McCain/Palin, you are definitely voting for American Idol....Well, American liars and whiners who want to be idols.
I'll take a constitutional scholar and a senior Senator over a life-long coattail-rider and self-professed 'hockey mom' any day.
- 11 votes
I AM VOTING FOR CHUCK BALDWIN - CONSTITUTION PARTY
Now, you might ask me why would I vote for a Third Party Candidate. Well, there are a few reasons.
First, An election is not a horse race. You don't vote just to pick a winner.
Second, I liked Penn Gillette's analogy of the two party system. He called it the Jerome Horowitz (Curly of the Three Stooges) principle of picking a candidate. Moe would tell Curly to pick two any two. No matter which two he picked, he got poked in the eye. That's how I feel when I look at both candidates. No matter who I vote for, I'm going to get poked in the eye, if not worse.
Third, John Quincy Adams once said about voting, "Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost."
Call it crazy, but I call it Principle!!!!
- 1 vote
Rockachaw 67
I agree with you and many others on the experience thing with Obama.
Lemme see now, Ronald Reagan was an actor and governor, Clinton was a governor, JFK a senator, FDR SECNAV and gov of NY, George l CIA honcho, Junior a gov, Carter another gov, Lincoln a congressman?, Truman a Veep, Ike a soldier with no experience in congress.
It seems to me that the whole experience thing is little more than a red herring. Try to come up with a president who had sufficient "experience" before assuming office. Experience at what exactly?
- 8 votes
Exactly true. No one other than a first term president seeking reelection has any experience as the President of the United States!
- 5 votes
Wow - I like what you said.
How about - You couldn't be a student for 143 days and become the Presidnnt of the college.
- 2 votes
Get over the experience bul@!$%#. JFK, Lincolon, FDR all had equal or just as much experience as Obama. Come up with another reason for not voting for him.
On Saturday, former Bush speechwriter David Frum wrote on his National Review blog, "George W. Bush had very slight executive experience before becoming president. His views were not well known. He won the nomination exactly in the same way that Palin has won the hearts of so many conservatives: by sending cultural cues to convince them that he was one of them, understood them, sympathized with them. So that made everything else irrelevant in 2000 - as it seems again to be doing in 2008."
But in the end, Frum wrote, Bush lacked "important aspects of leadership which is how we got into the mess from which he needed to rescue the country and himself."
- 6 votes
All of these comments about 143 days of experience...Well, if he was a white man with 143 days of experience it would likely fly. In my line of work I've seen it more than once. I have a white friend that I recommended to the firm I worked with and watched her get promoted after a shortwhile. My boss told me that he was afraid some of our clients wouldn't take to dealing with me as well as her. But they were "not as progressive" as he was, according to him. Yeah, okay.
- 1 vote
Over 18 million voters (and even more caucus supporters- not counted in vote tallies) found Obama has what it takes to be President. He was my second choice in the Iowa caucus, my first choice was Biden. He's got great academic credentials, unlike either McCain or Palin. I for one think the last 8 years have shown that intellect (often related, but not exclusively tied to academic success) is important. Look at the VP picks. Whether McCain lucked into a successful pick (from a campaign stand point) will be seen, but anyone who believes that Palin is the most qualified GOP, man or women to share the ticket with McCain is either uninformed, or has as much trouble with the truth as Palin. Obama and McCain's VP pick informs voters of their judgment and thought process. Obama had a great vetting team, had no media leaks, and picked in my opinion the best possible choice. Even those who wanted Hillary would not argue that Biden is qualified experienced etc. McCain used the media, they told Robert Novak he would name his pick during Obama's Europe trip. I don't like Novak, but he wouldn't have claimed the pick would happen that week unless a high level McCain operative told him. While I don't pity Novak being used, the point is the McCain campaign treated the most serious decision a Presidential candidate makes as a political tool.
In addition to Obama's leadership in picking the best running mate, and his superior educational experience, Obama has served in the Illinois State Senate, in addition to serving close to 4 years in the US Senate.
- 3 votes
"'From the time Barack Obama was sworn in as a United State Senator, to the time he announced he was forming a Presidential exploratory committee, he logged 143 days of experience in the Senate."
You forget, Obama was a member of the house before he was a member of the Senate so you can't count his Senate experience as the only political experience he has.
- 1 vote
All of it, so true. Sadly though, a LOT of Americans (and largely very educated) can no longer tell the difference between American Idol and the Election. It's all pop culture and regurgitating some lines from a well delivered speech (when the teleprompter works well) and this bitterness. Its just such a trend to have an Obama sticker on your Range Rover around here. Its so funny how the people around where I am who clearly benefit from capitalism are on the latest American kick, OBAMA. They'll be back on Beanie babies, Crocs, and Botox in a few months.
Oh, and THIS IS NOT ABOUT RACE. The ONLY one who ever brings up race is OBAMA. can we finally ever get over that? He's written more about his struggle with his race than anyone has ever wanted to hear about or comment on, so that is such a non-issue. Well, except for his campaign. I guess he will use and say whatever he can at this desperate point.
- 4 votes
So I take it that you all will finally lay off Sarah Palin's supposed lack of experience?
- 3 votes
Jason:
Actually, it's McCain that was in the House before he was in the Senate. Obama ran for the House, but lost. He was a member of the Illinois State Senate, though, in addition to his experience with the Harvard Law Review and as a teacher of Constitutional Law at the University of Chicago Law School. Oh, and of course, he was a community organizer. ;-)
And, going by days the Senate has been in session during Obama's term in office, he has approximately 483 "days of experience" over the past three years. This is legislative days, not calendar days, which would increase the number slightly. So this is a conservative estimate.
In January 2007, when he announced the formation of his presidential exploratory committee, he had approximately 221 "days of experience", counting only his experience from 2005 and 2006.
Of course, this only counts the days that the Senate was actually in session as "days of experience". Which is roughly akin to saying that lawyers can only count their experience as the days they are actually in court.
- 2 votes
Would you vote for Palin as the President of the United States of America, or will you only give her credit for being VP
- 1 vote
PALIN IS ON RIGHT NOW GIVING THAT EXACT SAME SPEECH SHE GAVE AT THE CONVENTION, WHAT'S THE MATTER CAN'T SHE THINK FOR HERSELF THEY HAVE NO STANDS ON THE ISSUES THEY ARE EXACTLY LIKE BUSH AND THEY PROVED IT TODAY WITH THAT LITTLE STUNT THEY TRY TO PULL.
OBAMA STATEMENT ON THE LIPSTICK WAS ABOUT THE ECONOMY AND IF YOU SEE THE FULL STATEMENT YOU CAN TRULY SEE HE WAS NOT TALKING ABOUT PALIN. BUT THE McCAIN PEOPLE TOOK ONLY PART OF THE STATEMENT AND MADE IT LOOK LIKE SOMETHING IT WAS NOT. McCAIN/ PALIN ARE EXACTLY LIKE BUSH THAT IS WHY THEY WON'T ADDRESS THE ISSUES ALL THEY DO IS WHINE AND BTCH ABOUT EVERY THING BEING SEXIST SO THEY WON'T HAVE TO ANSWER THE REAL QUESTIONS.
LETS NOT FORGET McCAIN REAL SEXIST REMARKS ABOUT CHELSEA AND HILLARY CLINTON WHAT ABOUT THAT PEOPLE WHAT DOES THAT MAKE HIM?
- 8 votes
@fedupwithliberals - I won't have a problem with Palin once she speaks to the media and the voters and lets us know who she is. I'm sure no candidate EVER has gone this long without being interviewed, especially by the Sunday morning talk shows. It's this disingenuous stonewalling and charging of sexism and slander by the McCain campaign that has me truly terrified. Once the McCain campaign decides to let Palin talk, then we'll have a case to debate.
Now way : the only change your going to get from McCain is the change you will have left in your pocket after he gets trough with you. LOL
Linda, there's no need to shout. Watch the debates, and I'm sure you'll be able to see ALL the candidates speak for themselves on the issues.
I don't condone mean things that McCain has said. Ugly comments are ugly comments, no matter which party spews them.
- 2 votes
Well then why is McCain making a big deal out of something that was not true. Let's face the facts here that the last thing McCain and Palin want to talk about is the issues they don't want to outline exactly where they stand, they make references to what he might do but no specific. Why because if you compare McCain on the issues he lines up with Bushes policies and that would mean 4 more years of the same with no change.
Fedup: lies are lies also and the Republicans are loaded with them they constantly tell 1/2 truths and make things up as they go along. Why do you think they are hiding Palin from the Press and Why do you think they repeat the same old stories over and over again not to mention the constant repeat of the Speech made in the Republican Convention? Could it be they are running from the issues? YESSSSSSSSSS OF COURSE THEY ARE.
- 1 vote
Like I said, Linda, watch the debates. Check out their websites to see their plans. It's hard to give a complete outline of your policies in a 20 minute speech, so do some research on your own.
What lies (or half-truths) are being told? Do you have any specifics? Are you 100% sure no one on the other side has ever uttered anything but the complete, absolute truth? Please don't point fingers unless you have all the facts.
- 2 votes
What NoWayHussein is really trying to say is that he has formed his opinion from an uneducated narrow mind, filled with racial intollerance. Another slack jawed McAlzheimers supporter proudly showing us thier bigotry. You make blowhards like Bill O'Reilly proud.
McCain's own campaign manager said this election wasn't going to be about the issues. All they want to do is make attacks and hope the public buys into their lies. That's not running an honorable campaign.
- 1 vote
Today,,,,, McCain's own daughter said, "I heard my dad say it several times"
john mccain is one to talk. his comments are intentionally disrespectful even to his wife. while he knows and has used the metaphor of "lipstick on a pig" and knows it is just that a metaphor
type in 'john mccain calls his wife a @!$%#' and she how well he respects women
fedupwithliberals,,,, You ever hear of factcheck.org ???
McCain misrepresents Obama's tax proposals again. And again, and again.
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/more_tax_deceptions.html
Health Care plan ??? More oily words.
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/factchecking_mccain.html
Think it's all about cutting earmarks? Think again.
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/the_budget_according_to_mccain_part_i.html
Jim, why even bother with them? No matter what we say, they're always right and we're always wrong. Just like their candidate. Never makes any mistakes according to them. Never mind all the negative things that come up about their candidates, they don't care. That's how brainwashed these people are. Funny thing is they acuse Obama supporters of drinking the Kool Aid.... Heck, I believe they snort it up.
Louie... I have too... I didn't surrender my duty to the country when I retired, like McCain did for politics --- I just wish they where standing in front of me.
I for one am frustrated as I'm sure you are, but all they want is to get under our skin. I won't let them. I'm just waiting until the debates. Everyone will see, who will be ready to lead. McCain won't be it. No matter what gimmicks he tries, they won't work. He's obviously desperate to win, he will say anything to get your vote. Now he's the agent of change. Now he wants to run under the change slogan. Well I guess if you can't beat 'em, steal their slogan, right?
- 2 votes
Louie Lou,,, You are a good American,,, Don't ever stop
After this election, we get to look foward to to the campaining immediately starting again for the 2012 election ----- Like, Oh Joy
The Jab at Palin was clear. It was obvious what it was. The delivery could not had made it more clear. Start the jab, wait for the audience to respond, then finish the punch line, that is what Obama did, and all the Propagandists, are trying to cover it up. I am a McCain supporter, just like most of the Democrats in Congress where until he went up against their sham of a candidate. I am not going to pretend to be offended by the statement, it is what can be expected from typical politicians. I just find it annoying how the Liberal media, is propagandising by covering up for him, and he is lying through his teeth about what he knows was a jab. Then again, he has done nothing but lie about McCain, and his own past for 18 months (which anyone can see when they look for the facts.) the Obama Nation is an Abomination. The only reason he is will have a chance in this campaign is because of the Media Bias Propaganda, that targets the weak minded fools, who are asking not what they can do for themselves, but what their country can do for them.
- 4 votes
Funny isn't it ??? McCain called Hillary Clinton "lipstick on a Pig" 2 times at least in the primary
You can't be that Stupid --- Once again they took a short clip from Obama that wasn't talking about Palin & lied to you
It's neither an American Value or a Christian value the McCain campaign constantly keeps feeding you
Rick, did you ever watch 'American Dreamz'? Remember Dennis Quaid playing the President? He had to have Willem Dafoe whisper answers into his ear with the help of a listening device? That's the only way McCain will be able to "destroy" Obama. I wouldn't pass that by him either. Remember the "cone of silence"?
Hey Louie Lou remember the above my paygrade question. He can't think on his feet, he is not smart enough to be Prez. Without a speech in for of him he's lost.
McCain/Palin 2008
- 2 votes
Is that the best you got, Because I can show you some clips of McCain trying to answer some questions. Now those are hilarious.
The GOP is waging a deceptive dishonest campaign just to avoid talking issues
On the issues, McCain is just another Bush & they don't want to go there
I do not even have to respond to you, I can just wait for the Debates, and watch Obama, and his 200 advisors lay an egg.
- 1 vote
Louie,
I have never seen the movie, but I guess someone who believes Obama to be a good candidate, has to be living in a fictional world. So do you have anymore fictional scenarios to support Obama with, they seem to be his greatest asset.
- 2 votes
RiCK427sohc,,,,, You ever hear of factcheck.org ???
McCain misrepresents Obama's tax proposals again. And again, and again.
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/more_tax_deceptions.html
Health Care plan ??? More oily words.
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/factchecking_mccain.html
Think it's all about cutting earmarks? Think again.
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/the_budget_according_to_mccain_part_i.html
-------------------------------------------------------
Even the Pro-Life issue is deceptive --- What they are demanding is big government interferring with your family decisions
Ronald Reagan understood this & kept it as a state issue & out of federal government... Reagan was a strong supporter of States Rights -------- McCain either can't remember Ronald Reagan, or he lied
The only fiction here my friend is you thinking McCain is fit to run this country. But I guess, if he was the only option that was left for your party, you'd have no choice but to stick up for him no matter what, right?
- 1 vote
And Omama is the best the Dems have to offer? Your in bad shape. Not a big thinker eh?
What's so amusing is that you Celtic, seem to think you are getting under my skin with your witty little retorts---you're not.
Celtic, I bet you wake up and tune into Fox News to get your daily programing, huh? You're what I like to call a lemming. You follow those who will leap to their doom off the proverbial cliff.
Hey Jim you Libbys have to come up with something besides you old old line "you not smart"
You guys have been using that forever.
McCain will kill Omama at the debates.
- 1 vote
Celt, is that a speech impediment or are you missing the letter b on your keyboard?
So you think McCain is going to kill Obama in the debates? Remember this: the debates are about the issues at hand, which is something that McCain will struggle with. Bush and Cheney have put McCain in a box when it comes to the issues. McCain will fail to make his arguments clear, he will seem out of step on healthcare, the recession, the economy, inflation, job losses, jobs outsourced overseas, the wars in Iraq and Afganistan, high gas prices, record foreclosures and the decline in home values. Small businesses struggling, auto and airline industry near or at bankruptcy. But for some reason Rick427sohc, you and the rest of the Republicans think everything is OK. Is it really. Is the recession just mental? I guess the economy is OK, if you got a job! How do you expect small business owners to make it if there's NO customers. Can you honestly say that the Bush/Cheney 8 year stint has been good for this country?
- 1 vote
Hey louie, what have you guys had?? one two term prez since Rosey?
Your out of touch with the American people.
We like to win our elections, not steal them, thank you very much.
Come on back to earth louie. You are way out there!!! We didn't land on the moon, we didn't land on the moon.
- 1 vote
Oh hey sooner, I didn't know hear the special yellow bus roll in.
Louie your greatest liberal hero, JFK. Won his election by crook. Read about Chicago Democrate machine. Bush won fair and square. Thank you
- 1 vote
I didn't know hear the special yellow bus roll in???? Better catch it before it leaves. Quick!!!
- 3 votes
Celt, I'm not even going to dignify that with a response. And btw, are you voting on your posts? That is too funny!!!
Palin wants to play with the boys? Well... gloves are off! What's good for the goose is double good for the gander! McCain looks silly standing behind her - he needed his wife to get him to where he is in politics so now, he needs another woman to help him out again. She's just another pawn in the McCain board... for a woman, that's a shame!
- 1 vote
Celtic - your comments are so fitting as a republican brainstem. No facts... no issues... smear, smear, smear... Put your head back in the sand and you can pull it out right before the election. Everything is lost on you. You're the example of a FOX news wet dream.
Lets hear some issues? I'm listening. But I suspect this is the usual libbys attack, call people stupid.Liberals are sooo mean and hateful.
- 2 votes
Beware of BOTS for the next few weeks. This is the usual swift boat politics we seen in the past
A pig is a pig!!!!
Only a PIG would show 9-11 at a campaign. I live in NYC and it was a HORRIBLE, HORRIBLE ordeal. Networks refused to show the deaths of New Yorkers and since the World Trade Towers were even taken out of movies. It was HORRIBLE and the stench of dead bodies stayed around for many months after.
How Dare that PIG use 9-11 as a Political device. Even Gulliani should be ashamed of himself. 9-11 is not a day to commend your own duty, but the bravery of others. They showed a man leaping to his death. This is not a comic book. IT's real lives lost of families of real Americans.
The Republican Party who endorses showing any 9-11 to add fear to their campaign are a bunch of PIGS. 9-11 should not be spoken of with smiles from ear to ear.
- 3 votes
Rockachaw: But now it is nearly four years after he was elected Senator. Need I remind GOP that he has much more experience than Palin?
Jut for fun, here is a link to his speech at the DNC in 2004.
- 1 vote
Celtic - Bush won fair and square? In a pigs eye - Oh, and with lipstick on.
- 2 votes
Do some of you want to put Palin in office so bad that you'll make McCain President... especially after he said the following....
1. Nothings funnier than a joke about a woman being raped! McCain: "Did you hear the one about the woman who is attacked on the street by a gorilla, beaten senseless, raped repeatedly and left to die?" [1986]
2. Question: "How do we beat the bitch [Clinton]?" McCain: "That's an excellent question." [11/13/07]
3. Cindy McCain, John's wife, made the statement that John's hair was getting a little thin, to which he replied, "At least I don't plaster on makeup like a trollop, you c*nt!" [1992]
4. McCain said women need more "training and education" instead of fair pay legislation. [4/23/08]
Bonus: Not really sexist, but degrading: "Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly? Because her father is Janet Reno." [1998]
Bonus: Quote by McCain's adviser Alex Castellanos - Her problem is she's Hillary Clinton. And some women, by the way, are named [bitch], and it's accurate. - [5/21/08]
youtube.com — John McCain in Iowa on 10/11/2007 referring to Hillary Clinton's health care plan as putting "lipstick on the pig, but it's still a pig"
- 2 votes
I don't want to put either one of them in office, But the American people need to start thinking out of the box & realize that we have more than a Two Party System!!!!! Both Candidates are Council on Foreign Affairs PAWNS.
THINK PEOPLE THINK!!!!!!!!
Vote for a Third Party Candidate!!!!!
VOTE FOR CHUCK BALDWIN --- CONSTITUTION PARTY!!!!!!!!
forget the lipstick on a pig - forget everything including all the issues - campaign teams for both candidates are lying - you dont know who is telling the truth - follow this simple rule - who would you want to lead us for the next 4 years - on one side we have a candidate who has been a senator for over 20 years - who has dedicated his entire life to defend our country - who has crossed party lines joining Senator Kennedy to introduce a bill for immigration reforms that was defeated and he paid for it - who stated that we should've send more troops as were outnumbered by the enemy - everyone (including me) had doubts as to whether that was the way to go- he proposed this when everyone was against it - you needed COJONES to propose this - now everyone(including Obama) agrees that the SURGE worked and the soldiers will be coming home gloriously instead of defeated - we will have a First Lady who has gone on numerous trips abroad to offer help(medicines-vaccines-medical assistance) to poor children (mostly blacks) who are dying by the hundred daily - someone who as a Republican voted 90% of the times with President Bush but did not agree with 10% of the time - NOW ON THE OTHER SIDE we have a young inexperienced man (very likeable and veryeloquent) but I guess because of his sorroundings and upbringing found himself (by his own admission) experimenting with drugs and snorting COKE while in College - he has vored 98% of the time with Nancy Pelosi and a Democratic Congress that has a much lower approval rate than the President - AS FAR AS THE FIRST LADY - I have seen 2 clips of Michelle Obama - in one she was stating her dislike for our country and saying that she started liking our contry only after her husband started his campaig -
the other clip was recently when I saw her dancing with Ellen Degeneres - we have not been attacked since Sept. 11 - do you feel more secure today than you were 8 years ago? I believe rhe entire nation does - now on which side woould you feel more comfortable? the answer should be obvious
- 2 votes
I do not think that the country feels more secure today than 8 years ago. The southern and northern land borders are open to infiltration any time and almost anywhere. The Pacific and Atlantic coasts are not secure. Our ports are not secure. Pretty much every time the airlines are tested, the security measures there fail. Anybody that feels that we are more secure now is deluding themselves.
It's true that there is lying on both sides, but lying on the Republican side is an art form. The Republicans feel that if they keep telling their base and the rest of the American people a lie frequently enough and cleverly enough, the people will believe it. Sadly they are correct because too many of the people do not listen and sort the lies from the truth.
In politics, absurdity is not a handicap.
- Napoleon Bonaparte
A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.
- Mark Twain
What luck for rulers that men do not think.
- Adolf Hitler]
You can never underestimate the stupidity of the general public.
- Scott Adams, The Dilbert Future
- 2 votes
Jerry, i apologize if this comment is duplicated. No, I do not feel safer at all. Under Mccain, we would have a president whose first instinct is to fight. He already wants to bomb Iran. I do not think he should be considered brave for arguing for a major switch in strategy....the was was a disaster. And what about his judgement to go to war in the first place..to attack a country that did not attack us. Cindy McCain has done good things with her wealth, and i applaud her. You have distorted Michelle Obama's comment significantly, even Laura Bush agrees. So watch some of her other stuff...she has spoken out and given dozens of interviews.So, if you want to judge Obama on drug use in college, do we want to discuss McCain's carousing and wildness, and cheating on his wife. I don't ...that stuff is not important.Then we have all of the other issues, the economy, healthcare, global warming, social issues, future of the supreme court. Those are extremely important to me, and i disagree with mccain on all of them. So, to me, the answer is indeed obvious. I dread the thought of a mccain administration...scares the hell out of me.
Sherry,
I truly understand your concern about the Supreme Court. I do not believe that Roe v Wade should be overturned, but I'm afraid that the Judges that Obama would unleash on the public would overturn the Second Amendment or worse legislate San Franciscan values on the rest of the U.S.. Let's face it, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is an abomination with the lesgislation it imposes from the bench.
THAT'S WHY I SAY LET'S VOTE FOR A THIRD PARTY CANDIDATE (CHUCK BALDWIN), SO WE DON'T HAVE TO SETTLE FOR THE LESSER OF TWO EVILS!!!!!
Don't know who Chuck is...and i guess we are stuck with these two. Has Obama come out against guns..i think he is somewhat moderate. The thing about the Supreme Court choices....if McCain wins, he says he wants Roe v Wade overturned. I guess the difference is, Obama's appointees would be more of a live and let live philosophy whereas McCain's would be "my morals are the right ones and you have to live by them." It frightens me to have McCain/Palin making the decisions for me, for my child about how to live. And will the middle class have a chance under McCain, or do you think it possible Mccain is simply pandering to the right, and if he gets it, he will operate more from the moderate way he used to espouse???
Sherry,
I think McCain is pandering. Why else would the McCain Camp call Ron Paul and say that he would adopt some of his platform. The real reason that I really don't trust Obama is a few.
1) He has a lot of Globalist on his staff and is backed by The Council on Foreign Relations (Michelle is a member. Gun control is on their agenda along with One World Government, WTO, & NAFTA.
2) When he addressed Germany, He said Americans would have to be Global Citizens & learn to live with less (Again with the One World Government Agenda.
3) Obama introduced Senate Bill S.2433 The Global Poverty Act. According to this bill, citizens of the U.S. would pay a tax to the United Nations to increase the living standards to poor citizens around the world. Inside of this bill is a section that states that the U.S would comply with the UN's Millennium Declaration. This declaration states that the nations that comply with this treaty will unarm it's citizens. This means that Obama plans to circumvent the Second Amendment with this bill, yet have plausible denial. He also was at first against the Supreme Courts ruling in favor of second Amendment Rights until he found out that it was not politically expedient. I don't mean to be petty, but he did say that thing about clinging to guns.
I think he is hiding his or his handlers true agenda.
Hope that he explains my position some
For anyone on this board who mentions McCain in the same sentence with, defending this country needs to remember, he was a class clown and he got caught and endangered his fellow American comrades to the point they do not support him along with millions of other veterans.
As for experience:
Being experienced as a Governor, Senator, House Rep. etc. doesn't mean you will be a good President.
Leadership is key, representing the people and standing up for America's safety is the key as well as having the ability to change this economy around. A Lawyer is better than being an actor and since Laws govern this country, that's not a bad deal. Anyone can go to a room and vote, but to interpret laws rightfully and truthfully for all people is important too.
Just because you served in the military, doesn't make you a good leader. McCain was actually a class clown. (which is probably why he got shot down and caught - just to prove a point). I can respect him serving, but that's it.
I'm watching Dems and GOPers got back and forth and attack each other but this country is suffering. That's why we need to go a different direction.
This election has turned into a big dodge ball match and those who focus on all outside issues except who has the best ideas for the people of this country.
Who cares if the surge worked, find a way to end the war.
Who cares if your are GOP or Dem, we all live and work together. So I want a President that can be a good leader for all, not just one side.
Less Gov't caused the Housing Market to crash... that's why the Gov't is taking over now, because we are in a crisis.
I'm not selfish, tax me if it makes the country better because if the economy gets better my pay will get better. Not taxing me and suffering is one who wants to profit and not give. (just to be clear, Obama only wants to tax those making over $250,000. That's fair)
Integrity is important to my President. And the McCain camp is not showing any integrity. Who cares which side you are on. If a person shows a lack of integrity, what does that say for the person who supports their actions.
I watch an election that is suppose to be for the people to elect a President in a Democratic Nation yet, I see it turn people into hate spewing individuals. I don't mind good debating, but most of the time I'm noticing (mostly GOPers) just knock people and spew hate. Wow, how religious.
I'm voting to not have more of the same 8 years, point blank period. I'm tired of the suffering. Whichever candidate can present a better argument, then so be it. But the argument is not just putting a woman as a VP or the "look" of the party. The issues of this country are more serious than that. Palin has not been on the up and up. Which is a shame for stand up woman.
- 3 votes
I HAVE heard Obama/Biden plans if/when he takes office. When do I get to hear McCain/Palin? Or, Palin at all? This is unspeakable that a man like McCain would stoop so low. I've NEVER seen a candidate want the presidency SO bad. I mean, other than Nixon and he cared enough about this country to resign before he tore this county apart. Not the McCain camp, much like Bush, is to continue to divide the country and stay on this path of secrecy, pain and more suffering for the men & women of our armed service. How do you explain that the military had the highest suicide rate to date? Our deduct a wife & child's check because the husband didn't LIVE the whole month.
We MUST move forward. We MUST get our good name back. It was good to see Obama received so well overseas. People have HAD it. We are on a global stage and if we have to bring everyone kicking and screaming into the 21 century.
To NOT get OBL until you're president is scandalous Mr. McCain. I can't believe you would EVEN say such a thing. Why have you NOT told our military? Don't deny it. You even think it would be "good" for the "party" if we had a terrorist attack. How completely repugnant.
You want to talk about lipstick instead of the war, homeland security, economy, gas, foreclosure and on and on.
Somebody else had it right. McCain & Palin along w/right wings (not all) has brought a "Jerry Springer Flavor" to this posse. Lord help us if McCain wins. This county won't stand for that. As Obama says "ENOUGH".
Anybody seen Cheney. Think the lipstick thing would upset him?
- 1 vote
Then you must be the only one who actually has heard BO's plans if he takes Office. All I've ever heard is "change". Talk is cheap and that's about all BO can come up with along with cheapshots.
Personally also I couldn't give a fiddle what people overseas think about our President. We don't elect someone to please them. We elect someone to serve OUR country the best.
- 1 vote
Voter in LA...Do you care about the welfare of our soldiers in another country? Do you care if they are targeted JUST for being an American. You should care, they're protect your ass. Do you care about roadside bombings? If you read real news and not just our news. Watch world news if you want the truth. We don't have Freedom of the press--anymore. Bush eliminated THAT with his Patriot Act & his state run TV network---Faux News. Go read the Patriot Act and then come back and enlighten me. Do you NOT care that we went from the beacon of the world to look like we terrorist ourselves occupying a sovereign nation. Then comes Katrina and WE look like a third world country who's government turn a blind eye on a segment of our people.
- 1 vote
The last news report that I saw was about 20 years ago. Now, and even then, it is all sensationalized editorial; mere opinion; flippant comment.
Voter in LA,
Give me a break. I've heard his plan and so have anyone who has been watching television. Maybe you are the one who missed it. While Senator McCain and Palin were out bashing Senator Obama and community activists, Senator Obama laid out his educational plan for this week. Maybe your ears are clogged up with the lies and crap from the McCain camp until you can't hear. :)
We have heard nothing from Senator McCain or Palin about what they plan to do for the America people. Senator McCain was jealous of Senator Obama and compared him to being a rock star. Well, I guess Palin is McCain's rock star then. I don't hear him complaining now that people are saying Palin is a rock star now, do you?
- 3 votes
I am a CHRISTIAN that understands the word of God so to see the word of God coming to life makes me to know that God is God.
The Bible teaches us that to be forgiven for ones sin, one must stop sinning. Even if a person asks for forgiveness but continues to make sin ones lifestyle those sins will not be forgiven until the sin is stopped.
2 Chronicles 7
14If my own people will humbly pray and turn back to me and stop sinning, then I will answer them from heaven. I will forgive them and make their land fertile once again.
The Bible teaches us the below scriptures:
Mark 10
11 He told them, "Whoever divorces his wife and marries someone else commits adultery against her. 12 And if a woman divorces her husband and marries someone else, she commits adultery."
1 Corinthians 6
9 Don't you realize that those who do wrong will not inherit the Kingdom of God? Don't fool yourselves. Those who indulge in sexual sin, or who worship idols, or commit adultery, or are male prostitutes, or practice homosexuality, 10 or are thieves, or greedy people, or drunkards, or are abusive, or cheat people—none of these will inherit the Kingdom of God.
In the above scripture we find that an adulterer is one that divorces its mate for another which makes the adulterer not represent God. In its present condition, the adulterer will go to hell.
As you can see, God puts the homosexual and the adulterer in the same category as He does not make a difference between the two. In their present condition, both are hell bound. Therefore, those conservatives that support John McCain should either not support McCain or shut up about the homosexuals and those that abort their babies because their hypocritical ways are doing more harm than good to the Kingdom of God. If they are sincere, they can speak out against homosexuals, adulterers fornicators etc but they would have to go against John McCain as one can not coexist with the other.
It puzzles me that any Catholic or Jewish person would vote for McCain especially since the Jewish people shun adulterers and the Catholic .
Church will not marry you if you committed adultery.
This brings us to why the conservatives crucify gays while supporting John McCain the adulterer! If you do not know by now, John McCain left his "crippled" wife for a young, rich woman, Cindy, his current wife. He admitted to being an adulterer. No, God will not forgive John for simply admitting that he is an adulterer because he MUST stop sinning. God does not recognize John and Cindy McCain's marriage as He sees them as living in sin. Therefore, John MUST divorce Cindy and either return to Carol, his first wife, or remain celibate. John has done neither condition, which means that John McCain is STILL an adulterer regardless of his confession. Repentance means to stop the sin as well as the changing of ones mind towards that sin. Since the Evangelicals/conservatives know this about McCain, then why would the Evangelicals throw their support behind an adulterer? Isn't this picking and choosing which sin to accept and which sin to attack? Of course it is which would make ANYONE that say that they are a Christian and support McCain to be a hypocrite! They cannot rebuke the homosexuals or those that abort because they are just as guilty for supporting an adulterer. God will condemn them just as He will condemn John McCain.
The Evangelicals/conservatives that support McCain know about this but they do not want you to know about their sin as they want to appear righteous but they are just as sinful as the ones that abort their babies, homosexuals etc. These people are Pharisees as in the Bible; the Pharisees pushed the government agenda just as those conservatives for John are doing to do.
The Evangelicals/conservatives that support John McCain say that they care about this country but why would you want McCain, the adulterer, to be the leader of the free world. Doesn't this country supposed to represent God? Well, having John as president is not sending a message of godliness but one against God. How can this country be taken seriously for being a godly country when the people selected a man who is against God? How can McCain go before leaders condemning their actions when his own actions need to be condemned? He cannot talk about Bin Laden for killing people because from the Bible standpoint killing and adultery breaks God's commandment which means that John McCain is not any better than Bin Laden. God will punish this country for putting John McCain as president because John cannot represent a godly country. God will not be with this country if John becomes president because John McCain is an adulterer. We will be sinning against God and look what happened to the children of Israel for sinning against God. After what Bush did to this country and the Evangelicals supporting John McCain, I can see how the anti-Christ takes over the world. McCain and Bush are preparing for the anti-Christ.
Therefore, when you hear someone that claims to be a Christian that votes for John McCain, remind them of the scriptures that I posted and ask them if they are following the word of God or if they are going against God's word. Call them out and call them a HYPOCRITE because that is what they are, a HYPOCRITE. Let them know that God is not pleased with their action.
Remember, there are Evangelicals/conservatives that will not vote for John McCain for that reason so hypocrite will not apply to them but to those that vote for John McCain as they cannot serve two gods! It is either they are for God or against God as there is no lukewarm. God will spew them out because their actions are teaching a different theology from God's word the One that they profess to follow. In the Bible, in Romans 2, God talks about the outcome of the Evangelicals/conservatives, Christians that are calling themselves a Christians but is not living by the word.
- 1 vote
I am a Christian and I proudly will vote for John McCain
- 2 votes
stillkickin,
The devil is a liar! YOU are not a Christian because a Christian would not go against God's word! Scriptures have been posted so now they KNOW the truth! Therefore, when you spew those lies of being a Christian, then we KNOW that you are lying and YOUR fate is sealed with John McCain, Sarah Palin and the rest! Keep lying if you will BUT WE are not buying it!
- 1 vote
Celtic-451085,
You know, in the Bible, the ones that are going to hell felt pretty much the same way about Jesus Christ and we know where Jesus is and where those who feel the same that YOU feel will go. I guess I am in good company. Thanks for the vote of confidence, not that I needed it, but thanks just the same!
- 1 vote
Hey woman2woman I don't want to go to hell. But it seems that you know JC well, next time you talk to him tell him Celtic said hi, he'll know who your talking about.
woman2woman: Besides the fact I think you're being completely and unreasonably judgemental of a good portion of the voting public, do you actually know where John McCain stands in his relationship with God (or Cindy McCain, for that matter)? What if he's confessed his sin? As a professing Christian, that means he's been forgiven. So who are you to stand in judgement? "For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God".
As an Evangelical Christian, I will proudly go into that voting booth and vote for McCain/Palin, because their POLITICAL views are most similar to mine, as well as their social/moral views.
Stay home on election day, if you feel too self-righteous to vote.
Celtic-451085,
You said, "Hey woman2woman I don't want to go to hell."
Well, if YOU do not want to go to hell, then turn from YOUR wicked ways!
You said, " But it seems that you know JC…"
His name is not JC but Jesus Christ as that is disrespecting my Lord!
You said, "…well, next time you talk to him tell him Celtic said hi, he'll know who your talking about."
Of course He knows all about YOU as He does everyone! Want YOU change from YOUR wicked ways and tell Him yourself.
- 1 vote
You know, people called bin Laden a religious freak when he spoke from his Koran. No one was disrespecting YOUR lord by using abbreviations. Several people abbreviate. THIS is just another diversion to TRY and make it something it not. Typical, especially during an elections.
- 1 vote
fedupwithliberals,
You said, "woman2woman: Besides the fact I think you're being completely and unreasonably judgemental of a good portion of the voting public…," So who are you to stand in judgement? "For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God".
Here we go with another person that proclaims to KNOW the word and DO NOT! You see, everyone has a sinful nature which makes us to have fallen short of the glory of God. Everyone is sinners by nature BUT Christian's natures are sinners saved by grace because we have accepted Jesus as our Lord and Savior, we are supposed to fight sin, when we do sin, invoke 2 Chronicles 7:14 and Jesus will cleanse us. When sin is exposed, Christians are supposed to address the sin but not ignore it by saying stuff like we all sin or don't judge and other foolishness.
Christians are mandated to judge anyone that professes to be of God.
1 Corinthians 5
12 It isn't my responsibility to judge outsiders, but it certainly is your responsibility to judge those inside the church who are sinning. 13 God will judge those on the outside; but as the Scriptures say, "You must remove the evil person from among you."
Did YOU read the scripture? Whose responsibility is it to judge those in the church that is sinning? Who? CHRISTIANS! Since YOU are not a Christian, then I do not expect YOU to understand the word of God but to spread the propaganda of the devil!
You said, "…do you actually know where John McCain stands in his relationship with God (or Cindy McCain, for that matter)?"
He does not have a relationship with God! Look, go back and read the scriptures that I gave—wait, that might be hard for YOU to do since it appears that YOU have made man YOUR god!
You said, "What if he's confessed his sin? As a professing Christian, that means he's been forgiven."
Confession alone is not enough! Please get the internet and study 2 Chronicles 7:13 & 14. You will notice that confession and repent are two different actions.
Acts 17
30Such [former] ages of ignorance God, it is true, ignored and allowed to pass unnoticed; but now He charges all people everywhere to repent (to change their minds for the better and heartily to amend their ways, with abhorrence of their past sins),
Acts 8
21 You can have no part in this, for your heart is not right with God. 22 Repent of your wickedness and pray to the Lord. Perhaps he will forgive your evil thoughts,
Acts 3
18 But God was fulfilling what all the prophets had foretold about the Messiah—that he must suffer these things. 19 Now repent of your sins and turn to God, so that your sins may be wiped away. 20 Then times of refreshment will come from the presence of the Lord, and he will again send you Jesus, your appointed Messiah.
Luke 13
4 And what about the eighteen people who died when the tower in Siloam fell on them? Were they the worst sinners in Jerusalem? 5 No, and I tell you again that unless you repent, you will perish, too."
Parable of the Barren Fig Tree
6 Then Jesus told this story: "A man planted a fig tree in his garden and came again and again to see if there was any fruit on it, but he was always disappointed.
See, "repent" means to turn away from the sin with your actions and mind which McCain has not done. Confession means to admit to something that you did and yes, McCain confessed BUT he has not repented because he is still with his adulteress wife Cindy! You cannot repent while committing the sin as McCain and Cindy are doing. What about that YOU are unable to conceive? It is simple but YOU and the rest are blinded by YOUR itchin ear theology.
You said, "As an Evangelical Christian, I will proudly go into that voting booth and vote for McCain/Palin, because their POLITICAL views are most similar to mine, as well as their social/moral views."
Unless YOU repent, YOU will join McCain and Palin in hell but for me, hell is real and I pray that no man or woman on earth is worth me spending my eternal life in hell. I do pray that you to repent and return to God! You are not a Christian so please stop telling people that lie so since YOU do not believe me, then perhaps YOU will believe God.
2 John 1
9Everyone who goes on ahead and does not abide in the teaching of Christ, does not have God. Whoever abides in the teaching has both the Father and the Son. 10If anyone comes to you and does not bring this teaching, do not receive him into your house or give him any greeting, 11for whoever greets him takes part in his wicked works.
You said, "Stay home on election day, if you feel too self-righteous to vote."
Are YOU sure that YOU are not in the McCain camp because there YOU go twisting my words just like McCain twists Obama's etc words. Unless the Lord says differently, I do plan to vote but it WILL NOT BE FOR THE ADULTERER JOHN MCCAIN!
- 2 votes
hockibabe,
You said, "You know, people called bin Laden a religious freak when he spoke from his Koran."
They also thought JESUS and not JC was a freak, radical, devil etc but that did not stop Jesus and I pray that it will not stop me, one of His remnants.
You said, "No one was disrespecting YOUR lord by using abbreviations. Several people abbreviate".
How do YOU know what disrespecting MY Lord is and is not when YOU do not KNOW Jesus! How can YOU talk for Jesus when YOU do not KNOW Him? Stop trying to be Jesus' PR because YOU do not KNOW about MY Savior! Yes, that is disrespecting Jesus because there is ONLY one name that makes the devil tremble and it is not JC but JESUS!
You said, "THIS is just another diversion to TRY and make it something it not. Typical, especially during an elections."
Oh yeah, like McCain crying over a statement that he has made and when Obama said it he tried to make it something that it is not! And this comes from a group of people that bashes gays and those that abort BUT put an adulterer on a pedestal! Yes, YOU are right as this is typical to try to pimp Jesus for YOUR own personal gain but look what that has gotten this country! Don't YOU people ever give up? Of course not because as long as the devil is around, so will his diversion away from the word of God.
Let me tell you what is wrong with YOU people. You make it hard for the remnant of God to convince those that never received God that God is not what you people are portraying. YOU people have made it hard for others to accept Christ because of the hypocritical ways! The church is under attack but it is not from those on the outside, but those that profess to be of God but live a life different from God. In the New Testament, you will find that in the beginning, the attacks came from inside of the church just as it is today. Just as in the first century, those attacks escalated from inside of the church to outside of the church and it will happen again by way of the anti-Christ and it will be pretty much from folk like YOU and the rest. Keep pushing the propaganda from the devil as MANY are turning away from Christianity and others are refusing to accept the word of God. Of course, YOU and the rest fate have already been sealed.
- 2 votes
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |



